Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39923074›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Exploration of the optimal deep learning model for english-Japanese machine translation of medical device adverse event terminology.

Ayako Yagahara, Masahito Uesugi, Hideto Yokoi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ayako YagaharaFaculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University of Science, 7-Jo 15-4-1 Maeda, Teine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 006-8585, Japan. yagahara-a@hus.ac.jp.
Masahito UesugiFaculty of Medical Management and Informatics, Hokkaido Information University, Ebetsu, Japan.
Hideto YokoiDepartment of medical informatics, Kagawa University Hospital, Kita-gun, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Japan, reporting of medical device malfunctions and related health problems is mandatory, and efforts are being made to standardize terminology through the Adverse Event Terminology Collection of the Japan Federation of Medical Device Associations (JFMDA). Internationally, the Adverse Event Terminology of the International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF-AET) provides a standardized terminology collection in English. Mapping between the JFMDA terminology collection and the IMDRF-AET is critical to international harmonization. However, the process of translating the terminology collections from English to Japanese and reconciling them is done manually, resulting in high human workloads and potential inaccuracies.

objectiveThe purpose of this study is to investigate the optimal machine translation model for the IMDRF-AET into Japanese for the part of a function for the automatic terminology mapping system.

methodsEnglish-Japanese parallel data for IMDRF-AET published by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare in Japan was obtained from 50 sentences randomly extracted from the terms and their definitions. These English sentences were fed into the following machine translation models to produce Japanese translations: mBART50, m2m-100, Google Translation, Multilingual T5, GPT-3, ChatGPT, and GPT-4. The evaluations included the quantitative metrics of BiLingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU), Character Error Rate (CER), Word Error Rate (WER), Metric for Evaluation of Translation with Explicit ORdering (METEOR), and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) score, as well as qualitative evaluations by four experts.

resultsGPT-4 outperformed other models in both the quantitative and qualitative evaluations, with ChatGPT showing the same capability, but with lower quantitative scores, in the qualitative evaluation. Scores of other models, including mBART50 and m2m-100, lagged behind, particularly in the CER and BERT scores.

conclusionGPT-4's superior performance in translating medical terminology, indicates its potential utility in improving the efficiency of the terminology mapping system.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEquipment and SuppliesTerminology as TopicTranslatingTranslationsJapanDeep learningMachine translationMedical device adverse event terminology

Identifiers

PMID39923074
PMCPMC11807297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.