ArticleBMC oral health2025
Necessity of applying anatomical unit resection surgery in suspected posterior oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management and Prognostic Implications of Posteriorly Advanced OSCC in Contact With the Medial Pterygoid Muscle.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Deep learning radiomics based on MRI for differentiating tongue cancer T - staging.BMC cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAnatomic unit resection surgery (AURS), previously introduced, significantly improves the prognosis of oral cell squamous carcinoma (OSCC) patients with posterior oral anatomical complex (POAC) involvement. This study aims to evaluate the necessity of AURS in patients with OSCC suspected to involve the POAC.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 127 patients diagnosed OSCC with identical POAC involvement or suspected POAC involvement. Patients were classified based on the extent of POAC involvement determined from preoperative imaging. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to identify the impact of surgery approaches on the prognosis of patients. Univariable and multivariable cox analysis were conducted to identify independent prognostic factors of the patients.
resultsIn total, 65 patients with suspected POAC involvement, 24 cases underwent AURS while 41 underwent conventional surgery. 62 patients with identical POAC involvement, 31 cases underwent AURS while 31 underwent conventional surgery. The AURS group demonstrated significantly superior disease-free survival (DFS) rates (75.0% vs. 43.9%) and local-regional control rates (79.2% vs. 48.8%) for suspected POAC involvement. For identical POAC involvement, AURS also resulted in better DFS (51.6% vs. 19.4%) and local-regional control (64.5% vs. 25.8%). Surgery protocol, tumor involvement level, lymphatic invasion and pN staging were identified as independent prognostic factors for both DFS and local-regional control.
conclusionsAURS is a necessary surgical approach for both suspected and identical POAC involvement in OSCC patients, significantly improving prognosis and local-regional control rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.