Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39923047›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Enhancing collaborative clinical reasoning among multidisciplinary healthcare teams in a neurosurgery ICU: insights from video-reflexive ethnography.

Ching-Yi Lee, Ching-Hsin Lee, Sze-Yuen Yau, Hung-Yi Lai, Po-Jui Chen, Mi-Mi Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ching-Yi LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ching-Hsin LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Proton and radiation therapy center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Linkou, Taiwan.
Sze-Yuen Yau(CG-MERC) Chang Gung Medical Education Research Centre, Linkou, Taiwan. yauszeyuen@gmail.com.
Hung-Yi LaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Po-Jui ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Proton and radiation therapy center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Linkou, Taiwan.
Mi-Mi ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan NSTC 112-2410-H-182-024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical reasoning is a critical skill for healthcare professionals, vital for making accurate diagnoses and effective treatment decisions. This study focuses on enhancing collaborative clinical reasoning (CCR) among multidisciplinary healthcare teams in a neurosurgery intensive care unit (NICU) in Taiwan. The study utilizes video-reflexive ethnography (VRE) to examine the factors influencing CCR, the cognitive processes involved, and the efficacy of VRE in promoting CCR.

methodsThe study employed a qualitative research design, utilizing VRE. Participants included 17 healthcare professionals from a NICU, comprising attending physicians, residents, nurses, and respiratory therapists. Data collection involved video recordings of daily ward rounds, field observations, and reflexive interviews where participants reviewed video clips of their interactions. Thematic analysis was conducted on the transcripts of video recordings and interview.

resultsThematic analysis revealed seven key themes in CCR: information sharing, active verbal and behavioral information gathering, information processing and recall, modification and discussion, short-term indications, and management plans and goals. Information sharing was fundamental, with team members frequently exchanging patient data to ensure a common understanding. Active information gathering, both verbal and behavioral, was crucial for obtaining real-time patient insights. Cognitive processing involved synthesizing data to form initial hypotheses, while modification and discussion highlighted the iterative nature of CCR.

conclusionsThis study underscores the importance of effective communication, active information gathering, and iterative discussions in enhancing CCR. VRE proved to be a valuable tool for promoting self-awareness and continuous improvement among healthcare teams. The findings suggest that education programs should focus on developing teamwork and communication skills, and interventions should aim to optimize information flow and foster a culture of open communication. By enhancing CCR, healthcare teams can improve patient outcomes and ensure safer healthcare delivery. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not required, as this is not a clinical trial and does not involve any healthcare interventions with human participants.

Indexed as

Clinical ReasoningCooperative BehaviorIntensive Care UnitsNeurosurgeryPatient Care TeamAnthropology, CulturalFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchTaiwanVideo RecordingCollaborative clinical reasoningHealthcare educationQualitative analysisVideo-reflexive ethnography

Identifiers

PMID39923047
PMCPMC11806538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.