ArticleBMC oral health2025
Size-controllable synthesis of hydroxyapatite nanorods via fluorine modulation: applications in dental adhesives for enhanced enamel remineralization.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mini review on the synthesis of porous hydroxyapatite nanomaterials for dental tissue engineering.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Factors Influencing Fluoride Release from Dental Nanocomposite Materials: A Systematic Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Comparative evaluation of remineralizing potential of galla chinensis with nanohydroxyapatite, chicken egg shell and fish scale derived nanohydroxyapatite on early enamel caries- A single-blindedJournal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere has been little application of fluorine-substituted hydroxyapatites (FHAs) in dental adhesives. Previous studies primarily focused on the effect of fluoride content on enamel remineralization, neglecting the role of FHA particle size. This study aimed to synthesize uniform FHA nanorods of varying sizes by adjusting the fluorine doping levels, and to investigate the synergistic effects of the fluorine content and nanorod size on enamel remineralization by incorporating the FHA nanorods into adhesives.
methodsFHA nanorods with varying fluorine doping levels and sizes were synthesized based on a hydrothermal method. The characterization analyses of FHA nanorods were demonstrated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The composite adhesives containing 10 wt% different FHA nanorods were characterized via scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The colloidal stability, light-curing poperties, and degree of conversion (DC %) were assessed. The shear bond strength (SBS) was determined and the failure mode analysis was reported. The release of Ca
resultsUniform FHA nanorods of varying sizes were synthesized by adjusting the fluorine doping level (2 wt%, 6 wt%, and 10 wt%). The lengths of these FHA nanorods were 505.31 ± 104.43 nm, 111.27 ± 22.89 nm, and 66.21 ± 12.68 nm, respectively. The composite adhesives containing FHA nanorods showed good colloidal stability and appropriate light-curing properties. The SBS of composite adhesives decreased due to the incorporation of FHA nanorods, but the values still remained within the clinically required range. Three groups of the composite adhesives could release Ca
conclusionsThe strategy of adding the synthesized FHA nanorods into dental adhesives can be an effective approach to promote enamel remineralization, while maintaining adequate bond strength. The 10 wt% F-doped HA nanorods with shorter lengths exhibited superior remineralization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.