ArticleBMC primary care2025
Exploring expressed concerns and uncanny feeling in patients with shortness of breath calling out-of-hours primary care.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients contacting out-of-hours primary care (OHS-PC) with shortness of breath (SOB) are often concerned. Sometimes, they also have an uncanny feeling; existential anxiety that something is wrong in their body. How concerns and uncanny feeling are related to critical medical conditions that cause SOB is unknown. We therefore explored the relation between expressed concerns and researcher's judged uncanny feeling among patients who contact OHS-PC for SOB with potential life-threatening events (LTEs) as the outcome.
methodsThis is an explorative cross-sectional study. We analysed telephone triage conversations from patients with SOB who contacted Dutch OHS-PC between September 2020 and August 2021. We recorded whether patients expressed concerns and we judged whether patients had an uncanny feeling. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for the association between (i) expressed concerns and (ii) uncanny feeling with the outcome potential LTEs.
resultsOf the 1,843 patients with SOB, 43.6% patients expressed concerns and 33.0% had an uncanny feeling. Potential LTEs were similarly present among those who did and did not express concerns (OR: 1.07; 95% CI 0.84-1.37, mOR: 1.07; 95% CI 0.83-1.36), whereas potential LTEs were more often present among those with an uncanny feeling compared to those without such feeling (OR: 1.36; 95% CI 1.06-1.75, mOR: 1.35; 95% CI 1.05-1.74).
conclusionsAmong patients who contacted OHS-PC with SOB, a perceived uncanny feeling of the patient was associated with a higher odd of potential LTEs, while patient's expressed concerns were not. Critical reflective interpretation is needed as uncanny feelings are difficult to judge. Nevertheless, our results implicate that further research into uncanny feelings in telephone triage could further improve the understanding of the relation with potential LTEs. Furthermore, this could be used to investigate how triage nurses may become more sensitive to what the patient is feeling but not explicitly saying such as by paying special attention to paralanguage.
trial registrationThe Netherlands Trial Register, number: NL9682, registration date: 20-08-2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.