Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39923017›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurodevelopmental disorders2025

Validation of the Food Safe Zone questionnaire for families of individuals with Prader-Willi syndrome.

Elisabeth M Dykens, Elizabeth Roof, Hailee Hunt-Hawkins, Theresa V Strong

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elisabeth M DykensDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. Elisabeth.m.dykens@vanderbilt.edu.
Elizabeth RoofDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Hailee Hunt-HawkinsDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Theresa V StrongFoundation for Prader-Willi Research, Covina, CA, USA.

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jeffrey L Neul · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrader-Willi syndrome (PWS), a genetic neurodevelopmental disorder, is characterized by hyperphagia and significant behavioral problems. Hyperphagic individuals with PWS are chronically hungry yet rarely feel sated, and often engage in food-seeking behaviors. To avoid life-threatening obesity in their children, families implement food security strategies (e.g., locking food sources, constant supervision around food, alerting others). Although widely used, these strategies have yet to be systematically examined. We thus developed and analyzed the psychometric properties of a new measure of these diverse strategies, the Food Safe Zone, and evaluated them in relation to hyperphagic symptoms and demographic variables. In doing so, we also shine a light on the extraordinary efforts of families in managing their children's hyperphagia.

methodsOur team developed 20 FSZ items that were revised for clarity and completeness in an iterative feedback process with stakeholders, including parents, PWS specialists, and individuals with PWS. The FSZ was pilot tested, descriptive findings were reviewed by additional stakeholders, and then administered to 624 parents in a large-scale study. Based on an open-ended question, "Is there anything else you do to ensure food safety?" two additional items were added and evaluated in a follow-up study.

resultsPrincipal component analyses revealed that 21 FSZ items loaded onto 5 factors that were readily interpretable, accounting for 67% of test variance: Alerting Others and Food Supervision in the Community; Locking or Restricting Food Sources; Checking for Food; At Home Supervision and Meals; and Avoiding Food Settings. Internal consistency and test-rest reliability were robust. Convergent validity analyses revealed that parents implemented FSZ strategies in response to the severity of their child's hyperphagia, and not their child's age, gender or PWS genetic subtype.

conclusionsThe psychometrically sound FSZ holds promise for future research, especially on the effects of food safety tactics on family members. In future clinical trials, the FSZ could also be used to help parents think critically about their food safety tactics in relation to their child's hyperphagia, or as an exploratory endpoint; if hyperphagia is lessened, so too may food safety tactics, thereby enhancing familial quality of life.

Indexed as

FamilyFeeding BehaviorFood SafetyHyperphagiaPrader-Willi SyndromeAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleParentsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical trialsHyperphagiaPrader-Willi syndromePWS food safety

Identifiers

PMID39923017
PMCPMC11806870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.