ArticleBMC oral health2025
Turkish dentist practice and opinions on diagnosing and treating deep caries lesions: a web-based survey.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Evaluation of Turkish Dentists' Approach to Indirect Pulp Capping and Material Preferences: A Questionnaire-Based Survey.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study investigated the practices and opinions of Turkish dentists regarding the management of deep caries lesions using an online questionnaire.
methodsThe questionnaire had two sections: the first collected demographic data, while the second focused on clinical practices, including radiographic techniques, rubber dam usage, liner choices, pulp protection, and post-endodontic restoration methods.
resultsThe survey response rate was 20.4%. 18 participants were excluded due to incomplete responses in the survey. A total of 390 survey texts (19.5%) were analyzed. The gender distribution of the participants was as follows: 60% female and 40% male. Notably, none of the respondents used rubber dams for endodontic treatment. Male dentists were less likely to use a base under restorations (p < 0.05). Female dentists preferred single-session pulp capping for pulpal perforations (p < 0.05). Public hospitals utilized fewer panoramic films, while Oral and Dental Health Centers used fewer periapical films for diagnoses (p < 0.05). Glass ionomer cement was the most commonly used base material, and direct composite resin was the preferred choice for post-endodontic restorations, in contrast to the less favored indirect composite resin.
conclusionsDespite its advantages, the application of rubber dam was infrequent. Glass ionomer cement emerged as the predominant base material across all restoration types, exhibiting variability among dentists in diagnosis, treatment, and material selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.