ArticlePlanta2025
Different concentrations of carbon nanotubes promote or inhibit organogenesis of Arabidopsis explants by regulating endogenous hormone homeostasis.
Article in Planta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Edible layered double hydroxide nanoparticles on 3D scaffolds for accelerated biological cell development.Biotechnology letters · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionCarbon nanotubes concentration modulates endogenous hormone balance, influencing callogenesis and organogenesis efficiency, with potential for optimizing plant transformation programs. A unique feature of plant somatic cells is their remarkable ability to regenerate new organs and even an entire plant in vitro. In this work, we investigated how an important group of environmental factors, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) (both single-walled nanotubes as SWCNTs and multi-walled nanotubes as MWCNTs), affect the regenerative capacity of plants and the underlying molecular mechanisms. Our data show that both the induction of pluripotent callus from Arabidopsis root explants and the frequency of de novo shoot regeneration were influenced by the concentration, but not the type of CNTs. Raman analyses show that CNTs can be transported and accumulate in the callus tissue and in the newly formed seedlings. The contrasting effects of CNTs at 0.1 mg L
Indexed as
Identifiers
39922983What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.