ArticleCommunications biology2025
Comparison of CRISPR-Cas13b RNA base editing approaches for USH2A-associated inherited retinal degeneration.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond DNA editing: how Cas13 redefined programmable RNA manipulation and what still limits its therapeutic promise.Nucleic acids research · 2026Review
- DNA and RNA editing for the therapy of human diseases: current status, challenges, and future prospects.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Base and Prime Editing for Inherited Retinal Diseases: Delivery Platforms, Safety, Efficacy, and Translational Perspectives.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Review
- Multifaceted disruption of AMPA receptor signaling byComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas13 systems have therapeutic promise for the precise correction of point mutations in RNA. Using adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR) effectors, A-I base conversions can be targeted using guide RNAs (gRNAs). We compare the Cas13 effectors PspCas13b and Cas13bt3 for the repair of the gene USH2A, a common cause of inherited retinal disease and Usher syndrome. In cultured cells, we demonstrate up to 80% efficiency for the repair of the common c.11864 G > A and its murine equivalent c.11840 G > A, across different gRNAs and promoters. We develop and characterize a mouse model of Usher syndrome carrying the c.11840 G > A mutation designed for the evaluation of base editors for inherited retinal disease. Finally, we compare Cas13 effectors delivered via AAV for the repair of Ush2a in photoreceptors. Mean RNA editing rates in photoreceptors across different constructs ranged from 0.32% to 2.04%, with greater efficiency in those injected with PspCas13b compared to Cas13bt3 constructs. In mice injected with PspCas13b constructs, usherin protein was successfully restored and correctly localized to the connecting cilium following RNA editing. These results support the development of transcriptome targeting gene editing therapies for retinal disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.