ArticleInternational journal of hematology2025
Second-line anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody therapy mitigates the negative impact of functional high-risk status in myeloma patients.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In multiple myeloma, functional high risk (FHR) is a predictor of poor outcomes. It is defined as M protein reduction to ≤ 50% of normal, suboptimal response (SR), or progressive disease (PD) within 12 months (i.e., early PD). The clinical significance of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (MoAb) as second-line treatment for FHR myeloma remains unclear. We retrospectively investigated the efficacy of anti-CD38 MoAb as second-line treatment for FHR myeloma. We included 332 patients who were newly diagnosed with myeloma and received proteasome inhibitors and/or immunomodulatory drugs as first-line therapy. Their median age was 70 years, and 29.4% were FHR. At a median follow-up of 48.5 months, the overall survival (OS) in the FHR group was significantly shorter (hazard ratio [HR], 2.086; P < 0.001). However, the OS in the SR without early-PD group was comparable to that in the non-FHR group (HR, 1.659; P = 0.330). The OS in patients with FHR who received anti-CD38 MoAb as second-line treatment was similar to that in the non-FHR group (HR, 1.157; P = 0.660). Anti-CD38 MoAb as second-line treatment improved the outcome in our patients with FHR although FHR predicted a poor prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39922974What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.