Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39922967›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2025

SARS-CoV-2 infection rates and associated risk factors in healthcare workers: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Amit Bansal, Mai-Chi Trieu, Emily M Eriksson, Fan Zhou, Jodie McVernon, Karl Albert Brokstad, Rebecca Jane Cox

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Six Years ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amit BansalDepartment of Clinical Science, Influenza Centre, University of Bergen, 5020, Bergen, Norway. amit.bansal@uib.no.
Mai-Chi TrieuDepartment of Clinical Science, Influenza Centre, University of Bergen, 5020, Bergen, Norway.
Emily M ErikssonPopulation Health and Immunity Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia.
Fan ZhouDepartment of Clinical Science, Influenza Centre, University of Bergen, 5020, Bergen, Norway.
Jodie McVernonDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Karl Albert BrokstadDepartment of Clinical Science, Influenza Centre, University of Bergen, 5020, Bergen, Norway.
Rebecca Jane CoxDepartment of Clinical Science, Influenza Centre, University of Bergen, 5020, Bergen, Norway. rebecca.cox@uib.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To protect healthcare workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic, rigorous efforts were made to reduce infection rates among healthcare workers (HCWs), especially prior to vaccine availability. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections among HCWs and identify potential risk factors associated with transmission. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar from 1 December 2019 to 5 February 2024. From 498 initial records, 190 articles were reviewed, and 63 studies were eligible. ROBINS-E tool revealed a lower risk of bias in several domains; however, some concerns related to confounding and exposure measurement were identified. Globally, 11% (95% confidence interval (CI) 9-13) of 283,932 HCWs were infected with SARS-CoV-2. Infection rates were associated with a constellation of risk factors and major circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants. Household exposure (odds ratio (OR) 7.07; 95% CI 3.93-12.73), working as a cleaner (OR 2.72; 95% CI 1.39-5.32), occupational exposure (OR 1.79; 95% CI 1.49-2.14), inadequate training on infection prevention and control (OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.14-1.87), insufficient use of personal protective equipment (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.14-1.84), performing aerosol generating procedures (OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.21-1.52) and inadequate hand hygiene (OR 1.17; 95% CI 0.79-1.73) were associated with an increased SARS-CoV-2 infection. Conversely, history of quarantine (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.08-0.60) and frequent decontamination of high touch areas (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.42-0.64) were protective factors against SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study quantifies the substantial global burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCWs. We underscore the urgent need for effective infection prevention and control measures, particularly addressing factors such as household exposure and occupational practices by HCWs, including cleaning staff.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health PersonnelSARS-CoV-2HumansOccupational ExposurePrevalenceRisk FactorsCOVID-19Healthcare workers (HCWs)HouseholdInfectionOccupationalQuarantineRisk factorSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID39922967
PMCPMC11807171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.