ArticleUpdates in surgery2025
LapAppendectomy4all: validation of a new methodology for laparoscopic appendectomy simulation and training.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- First Touch course-the impact of a nation-wide boot camp on the transition to Surgical residency.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Appendectomy, whether open or minimally invasive (MIS) is one of the most frequent procedures performed by young residents. We designed and tested a new methodology and a new inexpensive silicone model for Laparoscopic Appendectomy (LA) simulation. This study aimed to assess their fidelity, usefulness and educational value in an introduction to laparoscopy course. The course was open to first-year general surgery residents. The group was divided in two and one of the groups watched a video of the procedure before the simulation. Individual performances were assessed directly on the models, using a specific assessment scale. Participants answered a questionnaire at the end of the course for evaluation. Thirty-five residents participated in this study. Execution, quality, and global performance were higher in the group that had more experience with the model. Thirty-two trainees (91%) answered the questionnaire. There was a strong agreement that the model was adequate for this type of course and face and content validity was considered high/very high. Participants strongly agreed that this model gives more confidence to perform a real LA and almost 97% (n = 31) considered they have learned solid foundations about LA. This study shows face, content and construct validation and also educational value for this new low-cost, laparoscopic appendectomy model. The integration of this model in an introduction to laparoscopy course showed good results in regard to an increase of confidence among first-year surgery residents. It can be a valuable tool for learning and training laparoscopic appendectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.