Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39922942›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Bioelectric stimulation outperforms brain derived neurotrophic factor in promoting neuronal maturation.

María Del Pilar Diego-Santiago, María Ujué González, Esther María Zamora Sánchez, Nuria Cortes-Carrillo, Carlos Dotti, Francesc Xavier Guix, Sahba Mobini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

María Del Pilar Diego-SantiagoInstituto de Micro y Nanotecnología, IMN-CNM, CSIC (CEI UAM+CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
María Ujué GonzálezInstituto de Micro y Nanotecnología, IMN-CNM, CSIC (CEI UAM+CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Esther María Zamora SánchezInstituto de Micro y Nanotecnología, IMN-CNM, CSIC (CEI UAM+CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Nuria Cortes-CarrilloInstituto de Micro y Nanotecnología, IMN-CNM, CSIC (CEI UAM+CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Carlos DottiMolecular Neuropathology Unit, Physiological and Pathological Processes Program, Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (CBM), CSIC-UAM, Madrid, Spain.
Francesc Xavier GuixGrup d'Enginyeria de Materials (GEMAT), Institut Químic de Sarrià (IQS), Univeritat Ramon Llull (URL), Barcelona, Spain. francesc.guix@iqs.url.edu.
Sahba MobiniInstituto de Micro y Nanotecnología, IMN-CNM, CSIC (CEI UAM+CSIC), Madrid, Spain. sahba.mobini@csic.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal differentiation and maturation are crucial for developing research models and therapeutic applications. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a widely used biochemical stimulus for promoting neuronal maturation. However, the broad effects of biochemical stimuli on multiple cellular functions limit their applicability in both in vitro models and clinical settings. Electrical stimulation (ES) offers a promising physical method to control cell fate and function, but it is hampered by lack of standard and optimised protocols. In this study, we demonstrate that ES outperforms BDNF in promoting neuronal maturation in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y. Additionally, we address the question regarding which ES parameters regulate biological responses. The neuronal differentiation and maturation of SH-SY5Y cells were tested under several pulsed ES regimes. We identified accumulated charge and effective electric field time as novel criteria for determining optimal ES regimes. ES parameters were obtained using electrochemical characterisation and equivalent circuit modelling. Our findings show that neuronal maturation in SH-SY5Y cells correlates with the amount of accumulated charge during ES. Higher charge accumulation (~ 50 mC/h) significantly promotes extensive neurite outgrowth and ramification, and enhances the expression of synaptophysin, yielding effects exceeding those of BDNF. In contrast, fewer charge injection to the culture (~ 0.1 mC/h) minimally induces maturation but significantly increases cell proliferation. Moreover, ES altered the concentration and protein cargo of secreted extracellular vesicles (EV). ES with large enough accumulated charge significantly enriched EV proteome associated with neural development and function. These results demonstrate that each ES regime induces distinct cellular responses. Increased accumulated charge facilitates the development of complex neuronal morphologies and axonal ramification, outperforming exogenous neurotrophic factors. Controlled ES methods are immediately applicable in creating mature neuronal cultures in vitro with minimal chemical intervention.

Indexed as

Brain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorElectric StimulationNeurogenesisNeuronsCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorHumansBDNF protein, humanBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorBiochemical-free stimulationCharge injectionElectrical stimulationNeural extracellular vesiclesNeuronal differentiation and maturation

Identifiers

PMID39922942
PMCPMC11807145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.