Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39922925›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2025

Breaking the silence: challenges and opportunities in pediatric drug development.

Kanwaljit Singh, Tim Franson, Susan McCune, Daniel Jorgensen, Kenneth Getz, Cynthia Bearer, Jonathan M Davis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Determinants of Infant Participation and Non-Participation in Primary Prevention Trials.Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kanwaljit SinghThe Critical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Tim FransonFaegre Drinker Consulting, Washington DC, USA.
Susan McCunePPD Clinical Research Services of Thermo Fisher Scientific, Washington, DC, USA.
Daniel JorgensenDMJ Consulting, Wayne, PA, USA.
Kenneth GetzThe Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, Boston, MA, USA.
Cynthia BearerThe Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jonathan M DavisThe Department of Pediatrics and the Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. Jonathan.Davis1@tuftsmedicine.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric drug development faces significant challenges, including underfunding, ethical concerns, and complex regulatory frameworks. Despite significant advances in adult drug development, children remain underserved due to their unique physiological needs and difficulties conducting clinical trials. Current pediatric therapeutic options are limited, off-label, and lack evidence from well-controlled trials. Incorporating global regulatory frameworks can provide valuable insights when addressing these challenges. The disparity in investment is evident as several pharmaceutical companies have recently closed their pediatric drug centers with plans to focus on more profitable adult markets, leaving pediatric research underprioritized. This article discusses the root causes of this imbalance and potential solutions including: 1) the use of emerging technologies - artificial intelligence, modeling, and simulation; 2) leveraging innovative trial designs, 3) the use of real-world data, 4) the need for public-private partnerships to drive progress in pediatric drug development; and 5) advocacy groups to shape policies and investments. By focusing on enhancing regulatory incentives, encouraging long-term industry commitment, and engaging patient advocacy groups, a more sustainable pipeline can be established. This call to action underscores the moral imperative of prioritizing pediatric health and fostering innovation to improve outcomes for vulnerable pediatric populations and shape a healthier future for all children. IMPACT: Pediatric drug development faces significant challenges, including underfunding, ethical concerns, and complex regulatory frameworks. The most important causes include the absence of robust advocacy, regulatory hurdles, and economic disincentives. Potential solutions involve leveraging innovative trial designs, the use of real-world data, and public-private partnerships.

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentPediatricsArtificial IntelligenceChildClinical Trials as TopicDrug IndustryHumansPatient AdvocacyPublic-Private Sector Partnerships

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.