ReviewPediatric research2025
Breaking the silence: challenges and opportunities in pediatric drug development.
Review in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric Extrapolation in Neuropsychiatric Drug Development: Leveraging Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Strategies to Facilitate FDA Approvals.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Determinants of Infant Participation and Non-Participation in Primary Prevention Trials.Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme · 2026Article
- Sponsor Initiated Requests to Delay Pediatric Postmarketing Studies.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2026Article
- The quintessential role for CAR T cell therapy in children, adolescents and young adults with cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Policy Without Penalty: A Review of Pediatric Research Equity Act Noncompliance Letters.Pediatrics · 2026Article
- From PICU to NICU: Extrapolating Meropenem Exposure From Pediatric to Neonatal Intensive Care Patients.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Evolving Real-World Data and Evidence Use for New Drugs and Regenerative Medical Products Approvals in Japan-An Analysis of the 6-Year Trend.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Review
- State-of-the-Art on Model-Informed Drug Development Approaches for Pediatric Rare Diseases.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Review
- Challenges and Considerations in Manipulating Oral Dosage Forms in Paediatric Healthcare Settings: A Narrative Review.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2025Review
- Enhancing Drug Development for Paediatric Pulmonary Hypertension-An Integrative Perspective.Pulmonary circulation · 2025Review
- Characteristics of pediatric interventional drug trials registered between 2015 and 2024 on ClinicalTrials.gov.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric drug development faces significant challenges, including underfunding, ethical concerns, and complex regulatory frameworks. Despite significant advances in adult drug development, children remain underserved due to their unique physiological needs and difficulties conducting clinical trials. Current pediatric therapeutic options are limited, off-label, and lack evidence from well-controlled trials. Incorporating global regulatory frameworks can provide valuable insights when addressing these challenges. The disparity in investment is evident as several pharmaceutical companies have recently closed their pediatric drug centers with plans to focus on more profitable adult markets, leaving pediatric research underprioritized. This article discusses the root causes of this imbalance and potential solutions including: 1) the use of emerging technologies - artificial intelligence, modeling, and simulation; 2) leveraging innovative trial designs, 3) the use of real-world data, 4) the need for public-private partnerships to drive progress in pediatric drug development; and 5) advocacy groups to shape policies and investments. By focusing on enhancing regulatory incentives, encouraging long-term industry commitment, and engaging patient advocacy groups, a more sustainable pipeline can be established. This call to action underscores the moral imperative of prioritizing pediatric health and fostering innovation to improve outcomes for vulnerable pediatric populations and shape a healthier future for all children. IMPACT: Pediatric drug development faces significant challenges, including underfunding, ethical concerns, and complex regulatory frameworks. The most important causes include the absence of robust advocacy, regulatory hurdles, and economic disincentives. Potential solutions involve leveraging innovative trial designs, the use of real-world data, and public-private partnerships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39922925What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.