Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39922912›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Spatial disparities and dynamics in the high quality agricultural development in Heilongjiang Province of China.

Jingting Yu, Guanghao Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jingting YuSchool of Management, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.
Guanghao WuFaculty of Applied Economics, University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing, 102488, China. wuguanghao@ucass.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a key commodity and strategic reserve grain base in China, evaluating and analyzing the high-quality agricultural development (HQAD) within Heilongjiang Province is crucial for advancing national agricultural quality. We construct a multidimensional evaluation framework with 19 indicators across four dimensions: green agriculture, quality and efficiency improvement of supply, agricultural structural coordination, and shared benefits of development. Using the Entropy Weighted-TOPSIS model, Dagum's Gini Coefficient, and the Markov chain, the study quantifies the HQAD in Heilongjiang from 2013 to 2022, examining regional disparities and development dynamics. The findings indicate that: (1) Heilongjiang's overall HQAD has steadily improved, rising from 0.160 in 2013 to 0.396 in 2022, with an annual average growth rate of 10.595%. Agricultural structural coordination, growing at 2.160% annually, has become the primary constraint. (2) Spatial imbalances are evident. The 12 prefecture-level cities in the province are grouped into four regions based on agricultural endowments. Harbin and Qiqihar in the Songnen Plain, and Mudanjiang in the Mudanjiang Semi-mountainous Areas lead in HQAD, while cities in the Sanjiang Plain lag behind. Intra-regional disparities are narrowing in Sanjiang Plain and Xing'an Mountains Regions except the Songnen Plain (from 0.000 to 0.062 during 2013-2022), increasingly contributing to the overall disparity (from 15.717% to 30.065% during 2013-2022). Inter-regional disparities are decreasing, with their contribution declining from 80.769% in 2013 to 37.481% in 2022. (3) HQAD levels in cities exhibit low mobility, fluctuating between medium-low (57.993%) and medium-high (22.082%). Based on these findings, we recommend strengthening agricultural structural coordination, promoting coordinated HQAD tailored to local conditions, and pursing institutional breakthroughs.

Indexed as

Dynamic evolution of distributionHeilongjiang Province, ChinaHigh-quality agricultural developmentMajor grain-producing provincesRegional disparities

Identifiers

PMID39922912
PMCPMC11807161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.