Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39922855›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Deep learning based gasket fault detection: a CNN approach.

S Arumai Shiney, R Seetharaman, V J Sharmila, S Prathiba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S Arumai Shiney *Department of Computer Science and Engineering, S.A. Engineering College, Chennai, India. arumaishiney@saec.ac.in.
R Seetharaman *Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, College of Engineering Guindy Campus, Anna University, Chennai, India. rseetharamanece@annauniv.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5728-6386
V J SharmilaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Loyola-ICAM College of Engineering and Technology, Chennai, India.
S PrathibaDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Loyola-ICAM College of Engineering and Technology, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gasket inspection is a critical step in the quality control of a product. The proposed method automates the detection of misaligned or incorrectly fitting gaskets, ensuring timely repair action. The suggested method uses deep learning approaches to recognize and evaluate radiator images, with a focus on identifying misaligned or incorrectly installed gaskets. Deep learning algorithms are specific for feature extraction and classification together with a convolutional neural network (CNN) module that allows for seamless connection. A gasket inspection system based on a CNN architecture is developed in this work. The system consists of two sets of convolution layers, followed by two sets of batch normalization layer, two sets of RELU layer, max pooling layer and finally fully connected layer for classification of gasket images. The obtained results indicate that our system has great potential for practical applications in the manufacturing industry. Moreover, our system provides a reliable and efficient mechanism for quality control, which can help reduce the risk of defects and ensure product reliability.

Indexed as

CNNDeep learningGasketGasket inspectionQuality ControlRadiator

Identifiers

PMID39922855
PMCPMC11807191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.