ArticleScientific reports2025
A multi-model feature fusion based transfer learning with heuristic search for copy-move video forgery detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unified frequency and graph learning framework for accurate and robust copy-move image forgery detection.Journal of forensic sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protecting data from management is a significant task at present. Digital images are the most general data representation. Images might be employed in many areas like social media, the military, evidence in courts, intelligence fields, security purposes, and newspapers. Digital image fakes mean adding infrequent patterns to the unique images, which causes a heterogeneous method in image properties. Copy move forgery is the firmest kind of image forgeries to be perceived. It occurs by duplicating the image part and then inserting it again in the image itself but in any other place. If original content is not accessible, then the forgery recognition technique is employed in image security. In contrast, methods that depend on deep learning (DL) have exposed good performance and suggested outcomes. Still, they provide general issues with a higher dependency on training data for a suitable range of hyperparameters. This manuscript presents an Enhancing Copy-Move Video Forgery Detection through Fusion-Based Transfer Learning Models with the Tasmanian Devil Optimizer (ECMVFD-FTLTDO) model. The objective of the ECMVFD-FTLTDO model is to perceive and classify copy-move forgery in video content. At first, the videos are transformed into distinct frames, and noise is removed using a modified wiener filter (MWF). Next, the ECMVFD-FTLTDO technique employs a fusion-based transfer learning (TL) process comprising three models: ResNet50, MobileNetV3, and EfficientNetB7 to capture diverse spatial features across various scales, thereby enhancing the capability of the model to distinguish authentic content from tampered regions. The ECMVFD-FTLTDO approach utilizes an Elman recurrent neural network (ERNN) classifier for the detection process. The Tasmanian devil optimizer (TDO) method is implemented to optimize the parameters of the ERNN classifier, ensuring superior convergence and performance. A wide range of simulation analyses is performed under GRIP and VTD datasets. The performance validation of the ECMVFD-FTLTDO technique portrayed a superior accuracy value of 95.26% and 92.67% compared to existing approaches under GRIP and VTD datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.