ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Evaluating the implementation of a multicomponent intervention to improve faecal immunochemical test-based (FIT) colorectal cancer screening in primary care.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Programme-level determinants of participation in colorectal cancer screening in Italy: a national cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Evaluating incidence and mortality trends of early-onset colorectal cancer and adenoma in Belgium.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Screening has proven effective at reducing the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC). The faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is recommended for screening people aged 50-74 years at average risk of CRC in Alberta, Canada. This project implemented a multicomponent intervention in real-world, primary care settings in Alberta to improve the FIT participation rate and evaluated the reach, effectiveness and implementation outcomes.The multicomponent intervention comprised of in-clinic FIT kit distribution, patient education and reminder calls, was implemented in four primary care clinics. Reach was measured as the proportion of patients receiving the intervention. Effectiveness was measured by comparing the proportion of patients completing FIT during preintervention and perintervention periods. Implementation was measured by the perceived acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of providers in implementing the intervention. Data were collected from electronic medical records and validated survey tools.Four clinics implemented the intervention during an 8-month study period (September 2021 to April 2022); 99% of eligible patients received a FIT kit. The baseline FIT completion rate across participating clinics was 62%, which increased by 13 percentage points to 75% during the intervention period. Of the 75% who completed the FIT, 56% did without a reminder call, whereas 19% did so after receiving one or more reminders. More than 90% of providers perceived the intervention implementation as acceptable, feasible and appropriate.The multicomponent FIT intervention was perceived as acceptable, feasible, and appropriate and improved the FIT screening rates in pilot clinics. An implementation guidance document has been developed and tested to communicate the implementation process for use by other primary care clinics and aid in the spread of the intervention across Alberta. Implementing this intervention in routine practice can help decrease the incidence and mortality of CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.