Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39922566›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2025

Responsible governance of genomics data and biospecimens in the context of broad consent: experiences of a pioneering access committee in Africa.

Ahmed Rebai, Akin Abayomi, P Andanda, R Kerr, Kobus Herbst, J Mabuka, R Wamuyu, Daima Bukini, C Dandara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neuropsychiatry genetics in Africa.Nature communications · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ahmed RebaiComputational Biology, Centre of Biotechnology of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia ahmed.rebai@cbs.rnrt.tn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8954-8683
Akin AbayomiDivision of Hematopathology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
P AndandaSchool of Law, University of the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
R KerrDivision of Human Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Kobus HerbstAfrica Health Research Institute, Somkhele, South Africa.
J MabukaIndependent Consultant, Science for Africa Foundation, Nairobi, Kenya.
R WamuyuScience For Africa Foundation, Nairobi, Kenya.
Daima BukiniDepartment of Haematology and Blood Transfusion, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic of.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1376-4654
C DandaraPlatform for Pharmacogenomics Research and Translation, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

International collaboration in genomic research is gaining momentum in African countries and is often supported by external funding. Over the last decade, there has been an increased interest in African genomic data. The contribution of this rich data resource in understanding diseases predominant in both African and global populations has been limited to date. There has been some non-governmental funding dedicated to the advancement of genomic research and innovation by African-based and African-led research groups, but the impact of these initiatives is hard to quantify. However, there is now an opportunity for the global research community to leverage decades of genomic data and biospecimens originating from African populations. The experience we describe in this paper is of an access governance framework established under the Human, Heredity, and Health in Africa (H3A) consortium, given the task of managing wider access to the data and biospecimen resources collected via its various projects. The function of the Data and Biospecimen Access Committee (DBAC) is to facilitate the advancement of medicine and health while fostering the development of bioinformatics capabilities at Africa-based institutions or regional hubs. Our collective experiences and lessons learnt as a committee provide examples of nuanced considerations when evaluating access to African data. The committee was semi-autonomous in its establishment and had independence in decision-making. The DBAC continually advocates for the responsible use of genomic data and biospecimens that were obtained from African research participants, under broad consent, by primary researchers who no longer have oversight over the future use of these resources.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksGenetic ResearchGenomicsInformed ConsentAfricaBiomedical ResearchHumansInternational CooperationAccountabilityDecision MakingGlobal HealthHealth policy

Identifiers

PMID39922566
PMCPMC11808898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.