Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39922444›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2025

Body image and sexual function improve following prolapse repair.

Uduak U Andy, Kayla Nowak, Shawn A Menefee, Julia K Shinnick, Margaret Mueller, Abbigail Woll, Maria Florian-Rodriquez, Donna Mazloomdoost, Ryan Whitworth, NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Uduak U AndyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: uduakumoh.andy@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Kayla NowakRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Shawn A MenefeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, San Diego, CA.
Julia K ShinnickDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Margaret MuellerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Abbigail WollDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Maria Florian-RodriquezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Donna MazloomdoostThe Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Ryan WhitworthRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network

Funding

Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Data Coordinating Center Administrative Supplement: ODSS CDE FundingU24HD069031 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI MARIE G GANTZ · 2016 to 2026
$35.8M
Brown/WIH Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Site (UG1)UG1HD069013 · NICHD · WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL-RHODE ISLAND · PI Vivian W Sung · 2016 to 2026
$3.1M
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network 2021UG1HD054241 · NICHD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI David Dwight Rahn · 2016 to 2026
$3.0M
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Clinical Sites (UG1)UG1HD069010 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Heidi S Harvie · 2016 to 2026
$3.0M
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Clinical Site Application: The San Diego PelvicFloor ConsortiumUG1HD054214 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI EMILY S. LUKACZ, Shawn A Menefee · 2016 to 2026
$2.9M
Duke University Medical Center (DUMC) Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (PFDN) Clinical SiteUG1HD041267 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NAZEMA Y SIDDIQUI · 2016 to 2026
$2.8M
Pittsburgh Pelvic Floor Research ProgramUG1HD069006 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI ZYCZYNSKI, HALINA M · 2016 to 2021
$1.5M
University of Alabama at Birmingham: Pelvic Floor Disorders NetworkUG1HD041261 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI RICHTER, HOLLY E · 2016 to 2021
$1.4M
NICHD NIH HHS U24 HD069031NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD041261NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD041267NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD054214NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD054241NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD069006NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD069010NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD069013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBody image (a woman's perceptions and attitudes about her body) likely plays a role in pelvic organ prolapse treatment satisfaction and postoperative sexual function.

objectiveThe primary aim of this study was to describe changes in body image after surgical repair of vaginal vault prolapse. The secondary aim was to evaluate whether changes in sexual function are correlated with changes in body image. STUDY

designThis was a planned secondary analysis of a randomized three-arm trial comparing surgical approaches for vaginal vault prolapse. Women with symptomatic posthysterectomy vault prolapse were randomized to: transvaginal native tissue repair, mesh placed abdominally (sacrocolpopexy), or mesh placed transvaginally (TVM). Body image was measured using the validated Body Image in Pelvic Organ Prolapse questionnaire at baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Sexual activity and function were measured using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA revised at similar time points. Longitudinal analysis for changes from baseline in mean Body Image in Pelvic Organ Prolapse score and the proportion of women who met a distribution-based estimate of the minimally important difference was performed using general mixed models for repeated measures. The same method was used as a model to predict change in sexual function based on body image.

resultsA total of 335 women were included in the analysis: native tissue repair=123, sacrocolpopexy=107, TVM=105. Mean age was 66.1±8.5 years and a majority (242, 72%) had stage 3 prolapse. Baseline total and subscale Body Image in Pelvic Organ Prolapse scores were not significantly different by treatment arm. All arms improved by 6 months, and this improvement was sustained to 36 months with no significant differences between the groups for change in Body Image in Pelvic Organ Prolapse score nor minimally important difference-equivalent improvement. Ninety-nine (30%) women reported being sexually active at all visits, 131 (39%) reported they were not sexually active at all visits, and the remainder changed sexual activity status throughout the study. Amongst sexually active participants, there were no baseline differences in Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA revised scores between groups (native tissue repair, 54 women, 3.2±0.7; sacrocolpopexy, 43 women, 3.3±0.7; TVM, 46 women, 3.1±0.6). In sexually active women, change in Body Image in Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA revised scores were correlated at each visit and a significant association between these measures (P<.001) remained after adjustment for baseline sexual function, site, age, surgical treatment arm, and baseline dyspareunia.

conclusionBody image improves following repair of vaginal vault prolapse, regardless of the surgical approach. Improvements in body image and sexual function are positively correlated among sexually active women.

Indexed as

Body ImagePelvic Organ ProlapseSexual BehaviorAgedFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansHysterectomyMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionSurgical MeshSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcomebody imageprolapse surgerysexual function

Identifiers

PMID39922444
PMCPMC12325691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.