ArticleJournal of cancer policy2025
State law at the intersection of lung cancer screening guidelines and social determinants of health.
Article in Journal of cancer policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lung Cancer Screening Prevalence and Changes in 2024.JAMA internal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer is a significant public health issue and social determinants of health (SDOH) may contribute to lung cancer disparities. Given the racial/ethnic disparities in meeting eligibility and referral for lung cancer screening and the recent introduction of SDOH ICD-codes (Z-codes) into the electronic health record, state-level policies that address Z-codes may support the expansion of lung cancer screening criteria to consider SDOH.
methodsState statutes and administrative regulations were collected for all 50 states and DC using keyword searches in primary legal databases. Relevant content included state laws concerning lung cancer and/or SDOH screening with Z-codes, available as of October 31, 2024.
resultsTwenty states addressed lung cancer in their laws, mainly focused on awareness. Nine states had laws to create lung cancer task forces or programs, five of which focused on a specific population. In state laws that addressed Z-codes, eight states captured SDOH and/or the use of Z-codes within the healthcare setting. Six states had laws that mentioned the use of Z-codes alone would not be sufficient to provide behavioral/mental health services.
conclusionAlthough the introduction of SDOH risk factors into lung cancer screening guidelines may more effectively identify high-risk individuals, only handful of states have developed lung cancer specific programs, and a smaller proportion addressed populations disproportionately affected by lung cancer. Z-codes could help indicate when a person who is not eligible for LDCT under current guidelines, should still be referred based on an enhanced set of guidelines that factor in social and neighborhood factors that may increase the risk of developing lung cancer. POLICY SUMMARY: State laws have an opportunity to promote enhanced lung cancer screening guidelines that better incorporate SDOH based on population needs. State laws could also support the collection and capture of SDOH-related Z-codes in medical records.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.