ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025
Long-term health effects of a third-generation waste-to-energy plant: the experience of Turin (Italy).
Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Residential exposure to municipal solid waste incinerators and health effects: a systematic review with meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The long-term study on adverse health effects of the third-generation waste-to-energy (WTE) plant located in Turin, Italy, is part of a broader health surveillance system. We considered 369 236 subjects living in areas with different levels of emission fallout, as well as a control group, from 1 January 2014, until the end of the follow-up period. Hospital admissions for cardiac diseases (ICD-IX: 390-429), ischaemic heart diseases (ICD IX: 410-414), chronic heart failure (ICD IX: 428.0, 428.2, 428.9), cerebrovascular diseases (ICD IX: 430-438), acute respiratory diseases (ICD IX: 460-466, 480-487), and COPD (ICD IX: 490-492, 494, 496) were evaluated for the population considered. Cox models were used, considering individual characteristics and overall environmental exposure. We also considered all births (n = 8296) of women residing in the area at the time of delivery during the study period. Log-binomial models were run separately for each outcome (sex ratio, multiple births, preterm births, on term low birthweight and small for gestational age births), adjusting for exposure to other pollution sources and maternal characteristics. Miscarriages were evaluated using hospital admissions registries. No relationship was found for the outcomes considered in the wider area, neither with hospital admissions nor with adverse reproductive outcomes. There is an association with chronic heart failure and ischaemic heart diseases in the maximum exposure area, but the small number of events suggests caution in interpreting this result. This study confirm results of other health surveillance lines, showing no evident harmful effects of the WTE plant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.