Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39922008›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2025

Cultured and molecular measures of fecal indicator microbes in Gulf of Mexico recreational waters.

Julie Kelleher, Mike Cyterski, Brian R McMinn, Stephanie Dean, Adin C Pemberton, Jessica R Willis, Adam Diedrich, Seth McWhorter, Richard A Haugland, Orin C Shanks and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Julie KelleherOffice of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States.
Mike CyterskiOffice of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 960 College Station Road, Athens, GA 30605, United States.
Brian R McMinnOffice of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States.
Stephanie DeanOak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, United States.
Adin C PembertonOffice of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States.
Jessica R WillisOffice of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States.
Adam DiedrichOffice of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States.
Seth McWhorterOak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, United States; Water Division, United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 4, 61 Forsyth St SW #9, Atlanta, GA 30303, United States(1).
Richard A HauglandOffice of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States.
Orin C ShanksOffice of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States.
Asja KorajkicOffice of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States. Electronic address: korajkic.asja@epa.gov.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recreational waters are routinely assessed by enumeration of fecal indicator bacteria, such as enterococci, but research suggests viral indicators may be better suited for recreational water quality applications. Somatic and F+ coliphage were proposed as predictors of viral pathogens in recreational waters, but concurrent measurements of enterococci and coliphages and comparisons across different risk-based beach action values (BAVs) are limited. We collected paired measurements of enterococci, E. coli, somatic and F+ coliphage from three Gulf of Mexico beaches. Enterococci (colony forming units: CFU) were enumerated on mEI agar and by qPCR (Entero1a: target sequence [TS]). E. coli was enumerated by qPCR (EC23S587, TS). Coliphages (plaque forming units: PFU) were enumerated using dead-end hollowfiber ultrafiltration and single agar layer assay. The largest correlation observed was between Entero1a and cultured enterococci (r ≥ 0.51, p ≤ 0.0001) and the smallest (r ≤ 0.01, p = 1.0) between F+ coliphage and cultured enterococci. Applying equivalent BAVs for culturable enterococci (60 CFU/100 mL), Entero1a (9658 TS per 100 mL) and suggested somatic (14 PFU/100 mL) and F+ (3 PFU/100 mL) thresholds resulted in the overall greatest agreement in beach advisory status between coliphages and Entero1a (74-82 %) and lowest between cultured enterococci and somatic coliphage (65 %). This rich data set not only provides valuable insights on the incidence of coliphage and FIB in the Gulf of Mexico but will also provide a foundation for future research on fecal source identification and water quality forecast modeling in sub-tropical marine waters.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringFecesSeawaterWater MicrobiologyBathing BeachesColiphagesEnterococcusEscherichia coliGulf of AmericaBeach action valueColiphageCorrelationsFecal indicatorsGulf of MexicoqPCR

Identifiers

PMID39922008
PMCPMC12319669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.