Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39921843›Full record

ArticleMolecular diversity2025

Designing a multi-epitope vaccine candidate against pandemic influenza a virus: an immunoinformatics and structural vaccinology approach.

Mahesh Samantaray, Shilpa Sri Pushan, Muthukumaran Rajagopalan, Kajal Abrol, Jayarani Basumatari, T P Krishna Murthy, Amutha Ramaswamy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular diversity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mahesh SamantarayDepartment of Bioinformatics, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, 605014, India.
Shilpa Sri PushanDepartment of Bioinformatics, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, 605014, India.
Muthukumaran RajagopalanDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, 208016, India.
Kajal AbrolDepartment of Bioinformatics, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, 605014, India.
Jayarani BasumatariDepartment of Bioinformatics, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, 605014, India.
T P Krishna MurthyDepartment of Biotechnology, M. S. Ramaiah Institute of Technology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560054, India.
Amutha RamaswamyDepartment of Bioinformatics, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, 605014, India. ramutha@bicpu.edu.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4677-2263

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Influenza A virus (IAV) remains a significant public health concern due to its annual epidemics and potential for global pandemics. Despite the availability of countermeasures such as vaccines and antiviral treatments, their effectiveness is often questioned due to the emergence of novel strains with antiviral resistance and the variable efficacy of influenza vaccines compared to other vaccines. Traditionally, influenza vaccination strategies have focused on matrix, neuraminidase, and nucleoproteins. In this study, considering the crucial roles of HA and RdRp (PA, PB1, and PB2) of Influenza A, a reverse vaccinology approach is put forth in designing a possible promising antigenic protein toward the development of vaccines against H1N1 viruses. With the development of immunoinformatics approach, one can design/construct potential candidates for vaccine formulation against IAV with the epitope segments identified based on B- and T-cell recognition linked via adjuvants like EAAAK, GPGPG, and AAY linkers. Computational assessments of physicochemical properties, antigenicity, immunogenicity, allergenicity, and toxicity predictions, conducted to evaluate the potential of designed vaccine construct, indicated high antigenicity and potential interactions with immune receptors. Molecular docking of the vaccine construct with human immune receptors (MHCI, MHCII, TLR4, TLR7, and TLR8) followed by molecular dynamics simulations demonstrated stable dynamics with strong binding affinity. The computational immune response modeling with multiple dosages suggested significant immune activation by this construct against IAV. In essence, these findings highlight the potential immune property of the vaccine construct, and put forth the need of thorough preclinical assessments in transforming this construct as a vaccine against the challenging IAV pathogens.

Indexed as

EpitopesInfluenza A virusInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesVaccinologyHumansImmunoinformaticsInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeMolecular Docking SimulationPandemicsEpitopesInfluenza VaccinesHemagglutininImmunoinformaticsInfluenza A VirusIn silicoMulti-epitope vaccineRNA dependant RNA polymerase

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.