ArticleUpdates in surgery2025
The implementation of eras in Belgian esophageal surgery centers.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophagectomy for cancer is a highly invasive procedure with significant post-operative morbidity and mortality. The literature suggests a clear volume outcome correlation. Since 2019, esophageal surgery has been centralized in Belgium. In 2019, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines were published for esophagectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the level of implementation of these ERAS guidelines in Belgium. Surgeons from centralized esophageal surgery centers in Belgium were questioned. A Delphi questionnaire regarding peri-operative ERAS care and center-specific outcome data were sent to all participating surgeons. An ERAS scoring system was created to estimate and compare the level of ERAS implementation. Length of stay, post-operative pneumonia, anastomotic leakage and 30-day and 90-day mortality were evaluated. A high response rate of 94.1% was achieved. All surgeons used a peri-operative protocol in their center. The mean ERAS score for Belgian surgeons was 15.5 out of 20. The highest ERAS score per center is 18.6. Anastomotic leakage rate is 14.6% and post-operative pneumonia rate is 20.8% in Belgium. The mean length of stay is 12 days. Mortality after 30 days and 90 days are, respectively, 3.2% and 6.6%. This study gives an overview of the Belgian situation regarding the implementation of ERAS protocols in esophageal surgery centers. The overall implementation of ERAS guidelines in Belgium is good, but there is room for improvement in terms of uniformity nationally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39921804What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.