ArticleInfectious diseases and therapy2025
Economic and Disease Burden Associated with Invasive Escherichia coli Disease in the United States.
Article in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hospital Cost Components and Predictors inTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Article
- A qualitative burden of disease study in patients with invasive Escherichia coli disease aged ≥ 60 years in the United States.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInvasive Escherichia coli disease (IED) incidence has increased over recent years among aging populations and has rising antimicrobial resistance. Here, we report on a comparative, cross-sectional, retrospective analysis of US patients with IED to quantify IED-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), costs, and impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
methodsThis study included Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) members aged ≥ 60 years enrolled between July 2019 and January 2020. Patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 had experienced a recent IED episode (≤ 3 weeks before enrollment); Group 2 had experienced a former IED episode (13-18 months before enrollment); Group 3 was at risk with no prior history of IED. Data were collected from electronic hospital records, a patient survey, and the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. Mean costs were adjusted according to individual follow-up.
resultsPatient characteristics were generally consistent across Groups 1 (n = 289), 2 (n = 319), and 3 (n = 340). Inpatient hospitalization was observed in 84%, 44%, and 15% of patients in Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Mean direct costs per patient (per 30-day follow-up) were $17,168, $2530, and $1094 in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Mean total costs per patient in the year following an IED episode (Group 2) were $35,034 vs. $16,163 in the at-risk Group 3. HRQoL was poor for patients with recent IED, with a mean EQ-5D-5L utility index value of 0.25 on the worst day of illness. During a 12-month follow-up period, rehospitalization rates and mean number of antibiotic prescriptions were ~ threefold higher for patients who recovered from IED vs. those at risk.
conclusionsThese data demonstrate substantial short- and long-term impacts of IED on HCRU, IED-related costs, and HRQoL. Additional research is needed to further value the impact of novel IED prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.