ArticleInternational orthopaedics2025
Three dimensionalprinted titanium block to reconstruct severe acetabular bone defects in primary hip arthroplasty.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) with severe acetabular bone defect remains a challenge in clinic. The purpose of this study is to investigate the treatment technique by using the three-dimensional (3D) printing technology, and analyze the feasibility and preliminary effect of 3D printed personalized titanium blocks for acetabular defect reconstruction in primary THA.
methodsThe clinical data of 35 patients with Paprosky type 3 acetabular defect, who underwent initial THA with 3D-printed titanium implants in our hospital from January 2017 to December 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 21 cases were Paprosky type 3 A bone defects and 14 cases were Paprosky type 3B bone defects. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used to evaluate clinical outcomes, while imaging results were analyzed by hip rotation centres (V-COR and H-COR). In addition, postoperative complications were recorded.
resultsThe mean follow-up was 79.4 months (ranging from 63 to 94 months) and no patient was lost to follow-up. The total in-hospital blood loss of all patients was 462.9 ± 227.8 mL, accompanied with a blood transfusion rate of 31.4%. HHS improved from 44.5 ± 10.0 preoperatively to 85.1 ± 7.4 at the last follow-up (p < 0.001). Postoperative X-rays exhibited a good match between the 3D-printed titanium block and the acetabulum. V-COR decreased from 50.1 ± 4.7 mm preoperatively to 19.7 ± 1.8 mm postoperatively (p < 0.001). Similarly, H-COR improved from 33.1 ± 11.8 mm preoperatively to 29.7 ± 1.7 mm postoperatively (p > 0.05). Additionally, there were no significant changes in V-COR and H-COR at the last follow-up (p > 0.05). During follow-up, three cases of complications were observed, including two cases of wound redness and one case of partial sciatic nerve paralysis.
conclusionsThe 3D-printed personalized titanium block revealed accurate reconstruction, satisfactory radiographic and clinical outcomes, and low complication rates. This technique provides a reliable treatment strategy for primary THA in patients with severe acetabular bone defect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39921749What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.