Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39921733›Full record

ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2025

Assessments of protodioscin's antinociceptive and antidiarrheal properties: in vivo and in silico investigations on macromolecule binding affinity and modulatory effects.

Pompa Rani Ghosh, Md Sakib Al Hasan, Razina Rouf, Raihan Chowdhury, Balkrishnan Yadav, Emon Mia, Md Tanvir Islam, Md Rakibul Hasan, Siddique Akber Ansari, Irfan Aamer Ansari and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Pompa Rani Ghosh *Department of Pharmacy, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science and Technology University, Gopalganj, 8100, Bangladesh.
Md Sakib Al Hasan *Department of Pharmacy, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science and Technology University, Gopalganj, 8100, Bangladesh.
Razina RoufDepartment of Pharmacy, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science and Technology University, Gopalganj, 8100, Bangladesh. razinaown@yahoo.com.
Raihan ChowdhuryDepartment of Pharmacy, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science and Technology University, Gopalganj, 8100, Bangladesh.
Balkrishnan YadavDepartment of Pharmacy, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science and Technology University, Gopalganj, 8100, Bangladesh.
Emon MiaDepartment of Pharmacy, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science and Technology University, Gopalganj, 8100, Bangladesh.
Md Tanvir IslamDepartment of Chemistry, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, 6205, Bangladesh.
Md Rakibul HasanDepartment of Chemistry, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, 6205, Bangladesh.
Siddique Akber AnsariDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Irfan Aamer AnsariDepartment of Drug Science and Technology, University of Turin, 10124, Turin, Italy.
Md Shimul BhuiaDepartment of Pharmacy, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science and Technology University, Gopalganj, 8100, Bangladesh.
Muhammad Torequl IslamDepartment of Pharmacy, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science and Technology University, Gopalganj, 8100, Bangladesh. dmt.islam@bsmrstu.edu.bd.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protodioscin (PRO) is a furostanol saponin with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. However, there is no proof against nociception and diarrhea. The study aims to investigate the antinociceptive and antidiarrheal effects of PRO, comparing its efficacy with diclofenac sodium (DFS) and loperamide (LOP) using in vivo and in silico methods. Antinociceptive activity was evaluated using the acetic acid-induced writhing and formalin-induced paw licking tests, and antidiarrheal effects were assessed via castor oil-induced diarrhea in mice. Mice were divided into groups receiving PRO (2.5 and 10 mg/kg, p.o.), DFS (25 mg/kg, p.o.), LOP (3 mg/kg, p.o.), or combinations. Molecular docking studies were conducted on COX-1, COX-2 enzymes, and the Mu-opioid receptor (MOR), with toxicity predictions performed for safety profiling. In vivo results demonstrated that PRO significantly (p < 0.05) reduced pain and diarrhea in animals. PRO at 10 mg/kg, showed comparable efficacy to DFS and LOP (25 and 3 mg/kg) in both models. Molecular docking revealed that PRO had stronger binding affinities with COX-1 (‒10.0 kcal/mol), COX-2 (‒9.6 kcal/mol) enzymes, and MOR (‒7.7 kcal/mol) compared to standard drugs. Toxicity predictions indicate PRO is relatively safe in some toxicity parameters. PRO exhibits significant antinociceptive and antidiarrheal activities comparable to DFS and LOP, making it a promising natural alternative for managing pain and diarrhea. Additional clinical trials and pharmacokinetic assessments are required to evaluate its long-term safety for use.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsAntidiarrhealsDiarrheaSaponinsAcetic AcidAnimalsCastor OilCyclooxygenase 1Cyclooxygenase 2LoperamideMaleMembrane ProteinsMiceMolecular Docking SimulationPainReceptors, Opioid, muAcetic AcidAnalgesicsAntidiarrhealsCastor OilCyclooxygenase 1Cyclooxygenase 2LoperamideMembrane ProteinsPtgs1 protein, mousePtgs2 protein, mouseReceptors, Opioid, muSaponinsAntidiarrhealAntinociceptiveIn silicoNatural productProtodioscinSaponin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.