ReviewArchives of dermatological research2025
The financial impact and utilization of inpatient dermatology services: historical insights and future implications.
Review in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mohs Surgery vs. Wide Local Excision for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Comparing Recurrence Rates, Economic Value, and Aesthetic Outcomes.Journal of cancer science and clinical therapeutics · 2026Article
- The Inpatient Burden of Pediatric Dermatology in the United States: A National Analysis of the 2022 Kids' Inpatient Database.Pediatric dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin diseases affect millions of Americans, imposing a large financial burden on the U.S. healthcare system annually. Inpatient dermatology is a subspecialty focused on treating complicated skin diseases in hospitalized patients. Utilization of these services enhances diagnostic accuracy, shorten hospital stays, lower readmission rates, and improve patient outcomes. However, studies have indicated an overall decline in inpatient dermatology consultations and dermatology as primary admitting services. Currently, only two academic hospitals in the United States grant dermatologists admitting privileges, indicating decreased exposure to inpatient dermatology in residency despite the need for more hospital-based dermatologists. Therefore, this narrative review aims to characterize the financial impact and utilization of inpatient dermatology services. Historical and recent data consistently highlight the financial benefit of dermatologic hospitalizations and poor utilization of inpatient dermatology consultations. Teledermatology consultations also improve diagnostic accuracy and expedite interventions to improve patient outcomes. However, challenges like reduced reimbursement, lack of protocols, and limited resident training in inpatient dermatology have discouraged dermatologists from providing inpatient consultations. Policy changes are needed to promote these services that benefit patients as well as health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.