ReviewArchives of dermatological research2025
Panniculitis: a narrative review.
Review in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Panniculitis : Patterns and clues].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Ultrasound in inflammatory conditions of subcutaneous and articular adipose tissue in the extremities.Journal of ultrasonography · 2026Review
- Dercum's Disease: Bridging Present Understanding and Emerging Directions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Case Report: Duodenal neoplasm-induced panniculitis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Upadacitinib in a Refractory Case of Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency-Related Panniculitis.Cureus · 2025Article
- Pancreatic Panniculitis Without Pancreatopathy: A Rare Complication of Splenic Vein Stenting for Portal Hypertension in Myeloproliferative Syndrome.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Panniculitis is associated with a variety of disease processes that can be challenging to distinguish clinically. While diagnosis often relies on histopathology, sometimes this is not sufficiently diagnostic, which requires careful consideration of clinical features. We sought to provide an overview of the most common adult noninfectious panniculitis by reviewing not only the histological distinguishing features but also the clinical characteristics of various types of panniculitis including patient history, distribution, morphology, and other clues. A narrative review of both common and rare panniculitis primarily affecting the adult patient population was performed, with focus on recent English language publications. Additionally, both traditional and emerging therapeutic options are discussed. This article focused on diseases affecting predominantly adult populations and does not detail pediatric panniculitis or infectious etiologies. Overall, histopathology remains a key component in the diagnosis of panniculitis, but clinical characteristics provide substantial aid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39921712What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.