ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2025
Breast cancer screening rates and influencing factors among LGBTQ groups in Japan.
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disparities in cancer screening and preventive care access among LGBTQ+ populations: A cross-sectional study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Disparities in Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening Among Sexual Minority Women in Japan: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) individuals face significant health disparities worldwide, particularly in preventive medicine. In Japan, where breast cancer has the highest incidence rate among women, understanding screening behaviors among LGBTQ individuals is crucial for improving public health outcomes.
objectiveThis study aimed to elucidate the relationship between LGBTQ status and breast cancer screening behaviors in Japan, identifying factors influencing screening uptake and highlighting challenges in health management for the LGBTQ community.
methodsUsing data from the Japan COVID-19 and Society Internet Survey (JACSIS), we analyzed breast cancer screening status among 11,056 biological females. Multinomial logistic regression and stratified regression analyzes were employed to examine factors associated with screening behavior, comparing LGBTQ and non-LGBTQ groups.
resultsLGBTQ individuals demonstrated significantly lower odds of undergoing breast cancer screening (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73-0.91, p < 0.001) compared to non-LGBTQ individuals. Key factors influencing lower screening rates among individuals in the survey were primarily linked to LGBTQ identity, followed by higher rates of being uninsured, unmarried status, lower income levels, alcohol consumption. Stratified analysis revealed that uninsured LGBTQ individuals had significantly lower odds of screening (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08-0.70, p = 0.01) compared to those with national health insurance.
conclusionThis study identifies noteworthy differences in breast cancer screening behaviors between LGBTQ and non-LGBTQ individuals in Japan, as indicated by lower odds of screening participation among LGBTQ individuals, even after adjusting for socioeconomic factors. Findings underscore the need for targeted interventions, including improved healthcare access, LGBTQ-friendly medical environments, and awareness campaigns to address these disparities and promote health equity within the LGBTQ community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39921685What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.