ArticleJournal of animal science2025
Inbreeding depression for litter size in two mice lines under divergent selection for environmental birth weight variability using genomic data.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inbreeding depression (ID) is usually observed as reduced survival and fertility and may have a variable impact in different populations. The aim of this study was to estimate ID from genomic and pedigree data in the litter size (LS) of the high variability (H-Line) and the low variability (L-Line) mice lines divergently selected for environmental birth weight variability. Of these, the L-Line performed better on traits related to robustness. A total of 1587 females from 26 selection generations were genotyped with a high-density SNP array. LS data of 732 L-Line and 648 of H-Line animals were used. The following were calculated: pedigree inbreeding coefficient (FPED), genomic inbreeding derived from different genomic matrices (FNEJ, FL&H,FVR1, FVR2, and FYAN), from runs of homozygosity (FROH) and from homozygosity by descent probabilities (FHBD). FROH were calculated in the 19 autosomes (CHR). FROH and FHBD were divided into nine lengths and age classes, respectively. All the inbreeding coefficients were standardized by the mean inbreeding coefficient of the 1st generation. Regression coefficients (m) obtained from genomic data were between -3.71 with FVR2 and -5.09 with FHBD in the H-Line, and that estimated from FPED was -5.67. In the L-Line the m obtained from genomic data were between -3.52 with FVR2 and -4.55 with FHBD, and that obtained with FPED was -4.08. Significant ID effects were detected in CHR13 in the H-Line and CHR1 and CHR9 in the L-Line. The m negative trended to be lower as the ROH length increased. The age of the homozygosity by descent segment performed differently in each line, for example FHBD raised 128 generations ago produced a significant positive effect only in the L-Line. The effect of global inbreeding coefficients on the LS was negative in both lines with a higher impact in the H-Line than in the L-Line, suggesting the L-Line having higher robustness. CHR 1, 9, and 13 were candidates for future gene search. In general, more recent FROH and FHBD presented negative effects on LS while older FROH and FHBD presented positive effects on LS in both selected lines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.