ArticleResearch in nursing & health2025
Psychometric Testing of the Mutuality Scale in Patients and Caregiver Dyads After the Onset of Coronary Heart Disease.
Article in Research in nursing & health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychometric Evaluation of the Mutuality Scale in Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions and Their Caregivers Living in a Low-Middle-Income Country.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Mutuality and Self-Care in the Patient-Caregiver Dyads in the Context of Coronary Heart Disease: An Exploration of the Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the psychometric properties of the Mutuality Scale in a sample of patient-caregiver dyads following a recent episode of coronary heart disease. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted. Factorial validity was tested with confirmatory factory analysis. Internal consistency reliability was investigated with the model-based internal consistency reliability index. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to test convergent validity between mutuality and other theoretical and empirical variables associated with it. We included 150 patient-caregiver dyads (patient: mean age 65 years, 77% males, 71% married; caregiver: mean age 54 years, 21% males, 71% married). The CFA testing the theoretical four-factors (love, shared pleasurable activities, shared values, and reciprocity) of mutuality demonstrated adequate fit to the data in both the patient and caregiver version of the scale. Reliability estimates were adequate for the whole scale (model-based internal consistency index = 0.95). Significant positive correlations were observed between mutuality and self-care behaviors, and caregiver preparedness, supporting convergent validity. The Mutuality Scale demonstrated satisfactory structural and convergent validity and reliability in patient-caregiver dyads after the onset of a coronary heart disease event.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.