Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39921580›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025

Using deep feature distances for evaluating the perceptual quality of MR image reconstructions.

Philip M Adamson, Arjun D Desai, Jeffrey Dominic, Maya Varma, Christian Bluethgen, Jeff P Wood, Ali B Syed, Robert D Boutin, Kathryn J Stevens, Shreyas Vasanawala and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. pcaGAN: Improving Posterior-Sampling cGANs via Principal Component Regularization.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Philip M AdamsonDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5028-0683
Arjun D DesaiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0645-3257
Jeffrey DominicDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Maya VarmaDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Christian BluethgenDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Jeff P WoodAustin Radiological Association, Austin, Texas, USA.
Ali B SyedDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Robert D BoutinDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7887-9658
Kathryn J StevensDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Shreyas VasanawalaDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
John M PaulyDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Beliz GunelDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2541-4157
Akshay S ChaudhariDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3667-6796

Funding

Rapid MRI for Evaluation of OsteoarthritisR01EB002524 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Akshay Chaudhari, Garry E Gold · 2003 to 2026
$10.1M
Rapid Low-Cost Quantitative 3D MRI and Gait Assessment of the KneeR01AR077604 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HARGREAVES, BRIAN ANDREW · 2020 to 2024
$3.2M
Imaging of Joint Response to Physiological Stress with Age, Sex and in OsteoarthritisR01AR079431 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Feliks Kogan · 2022 to 2026
$2.9M
Development of Sodium Fluoride PET-MRI for Quantitative Assessment of Knee OsteoarthritisR01AR074492 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOLD, GARRY E · 2019 to 2023
$2.4M
Imaging of pain sources in myofascial pain syndromeR61EB036967 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOLD, GARRY E, KOGAN, FELIKS · 2024 to 2024
$2.3M
National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program DGE-2146755NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR074492NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR077604NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR079431NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB00252NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB002524NIBIB NIH HHS R61 EB036967Stanford University Radiological Sciences Laboratory Seed Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCommonly used MR image quality (IQ) metrics have poor concordance with radiologist-perceived diagnostic IQ. Here, we develop and explore deep feature distances (DFDs)-distances computed in a lower-dimensional feature space encoded by a convolutional neural network (CNN)-as improved perceptual IQ metrics for MR image reconstruction. We further explore the impact of distribution shifts between images in the DFD CNN encoder training data and the IQ metric evaluation.

methodsWe compare commonly used IQ metrics (PSNR and SSIM) to two "out-of-domain" DFDs with encoders trained on natural images, an "in-domain" DFD trained on MR images alone, and two domain-adjacent DFDs trained on large medical imaging datasets. We additionally compare these with several state-of-the-art but less commonly reported IQ metrics, visual information fidelity (VIF), noise quality metric (NQM), and the high-frequency error norm (HFEN). IQ metric performance is assessed via correlations with five expert radiologist reader scores of perceived diagnostic IQ of various accelerated MR image reconstructions. We characterize the behavior of these IQ metrics under common distortions expected during image acquisition, including their sensitivity to acquisition noise.

resultsAll DFDs and HFEN correlate more strongly with radiologist-perceived diagnostic IQ than SSIM, PSNR, and other state-of-the-art metrics, with correlations being comparable to radiologist inter-reader variability. Surprisingly, out-of-domain DFDs perform comparably to in-domain and domain-adjacent DFDs.

conclusionA suite of IQ metrics, including DFDs and HFEN, should be used alongside commonly-reported IQ metrics for a more holistic evaluation of MR image reconstruction perceptual quality. We also observe that general vision encoders are capable of assessing visual IQ even for MR images.

Indexed as

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsBrainDeep LearningHumansNeural Networks, ComputerSignal-To-Noise Ratiodeep feature distancedeep learningimage reconstructionperceptual image quality metrics

Identifiers

PMID39921580
PMCPMC12021552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.