ArticleNucleic acids research2025
A systematic survey of TF function in E. coli suggests RNAP stabilization is a prevalent strategy for both repressors and activators.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Core elements play distinct roles in promoter birth and transcriptional regulation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Model-guided design of regulatable promoters for synthetic biology.Current opinion in microbiology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcription factors (TFs) are often classified as activators or repressors, yet these context-dependent labels are inadequate to predict quantitative profiles that emerge across different promoters. A mechanistic understanding of how different regulatory sequences shape TF function is challenging due to the lack of systematic genetic control in endogenous genes. To address this, we use a library of Escherichia coli strains with precise control of TF copy number, measuring the quantitative regulatory input-output function of 90 TFs on synthetic promoters that isolate the contributions of TF binding sequence, location, and basal promoter strength to gene expression. We interpret the measured regulation of these TFs using a thermodynamic model of gene expression and uncover stabilization of RNA polymerase as a pervasive regulatory mechanism, common to both activating and repressing TFs. This property suggests ways to tune the dynamic range of gene expression through the interplay of stabilizing TF function and RNA polymerase basal occupancy, a phenomenon we confirm by measuring fold change for stabilizing TFs across synthetic promoter sequences spanning over 100-fold basal expression. Our work deconstructs TF function at a mechanistic level, providing foundational principles on how gene expression is realized across different promoter contexts, with implications for decoding the relationship between sequence and gene expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.