ArticleJournal of radiation research2025
Investigation of the safety of Radium-223 chloride in combination with external beam radiotherapy for bone metastases of prostate cancer.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- PET-guided therapy: synergies, strategies, and future directions in external beam radiation therapy and radiopharmaceutical therapy.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the safety of combining radium-223 chloride (Ra-223) therapy with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for patients with multiple bone metastases from castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), including lesions requiring urgent treatment such as those causing neurological symptoms due to spinal cord compression. We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with CRPC and bone metastases treated with Ra-223 therapy at our hospital between September 1, 2018, and December 31, 2023. Adverse events were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Of the 23 patients referred, data from 17 were included; 8 received concurrent Ra-223 therapy and EBRT, whereas others received only Ra-223 therapy. The median follow-up period was 20 months. Grade (G) 2 or higher adverse events occurred in seven patients (41.2%), and G 3 or higher in 2 (11.7%). None of the patients who received EBRT with fields involving the gastrointestinal tract experienced diarrhea, constipation, bleeding, perforation, or obstruction. Ra-223 therapy with EBRT did not increase adverse events compared with studies of Ra-223 therapy without EBRT. One case of G 5 Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, likely because of steroid use for neurological symptoms and the patient's underlying diabetes mellitus, was noted. The effects of EBRT cannot be entirely excluded, so minimizing field size and dose is recommended when combining Ra-223 therapy and EBRT. Our findings indicate that concurrent Ra-223 therapy and EBRT could be safe for managing patients with symptomatic bone metastases and castration-resistant prostate cancer who require specialized treatment, provided sufficient attention is given to the field and the prescribed dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.