Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39921417›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2025

Risk of high-grade cervical lesions in the second round of primary human papillomavirus testing in CervicalScreen Norway: A population-based cohort study.

Tone Bjørge, Nathalie C Støer, Sara K Hverven, Mari Nygård, Ameli Tropé, Birgit Engesæter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tone BjørgeSection for Cervical Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9096-5257
Nathalie C StøerSection for Cervical Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Sara K HvervenSection for Cervical Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Mari NygårdDepartment of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Ameli TropéSection for Cervical Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Birgit EngesæterSection for Cervical Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As many countries are transitioning from cytology to human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as the primary cervical cancer screening test, we evaluated the impact of cumulative HPV screening during the implementation of HPV screening in the Norwegian cervical cancer screening programme (CervicalScreen Norway). Data from the second HPV screening round was compared with data from the first round. The second-round analyses included only women who returned to routine screening 4-6 years following a negative HPV test in the first round. Associations between screening rounds and HPV positivity, cytology results, and follow-up recommendations were estimated by multinomial logistic regression, and relative risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) by Cox regression. There was a 42% lower risk of being HPV positive in the second screening round compared to the first (age-adjusted relative risk ratio (aRRR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 0.65), and a 70% lower risk of having high-grade cytology among HPV16 positive women (0.30, 0.12 to 0.78). There was also a 51% reduction in referrals for immediate colposcopy (0.49, 0.39 to 0.62). The overall risk of CIN3+ was 71% lower in the second round compared to the first (age-adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.29, 95%CI 0.21-0.40), and lower among HPV16 and other high-risk HPV positive women, but not among HPV18 positives. No cervical cancers were diagnosed in the second round (mean follow-up 2.4 years). Our findings indicate that HPV test results from previous screening rounds should be considered when designing optimal screening algorithms.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedCohort StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHuman Papillomavirus VirusesHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNorwayPapillomaviridaeVaginal Smearscervical cancercohort studyprimary HPV screening

Identifiers

PMID39921417
PMCPMC12079624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.