SynthesisPsycho-oncology2025
Psychosocial Interventions to Improve Wellbeing in Teenage and Young Adult Post-Treatment Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Psycho-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of technology-based psychosocial interventions on quality of life and psychological outcomes in adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Informing Cancer Education and School Reintegration After Childhood Cancer: Metacognitive, Psychosocial, and School-Participation Indicators.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- What Matters Most: The Top 10 Child and Adolescent Cancer Research Priorities in Australia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Article
- Paediatric Endocrinology: Before and Beyond 'Ringing the Bell'.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis systematic review explores psychosocial interventions aimed at improving the well-being of teenage and young adult (TYA) survivors of childhood cancer. It focuses on post-treatment survivors aged 13-39 years, examining the types of interventions trialled, their efficacy in enhancing different facets of mental well-being, and any potential negative impacts. The review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO and utilised randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess psychosocial interventions such as cognitive-behavioural therapy, psychoeducation, peer support, and physical activity programmes.
methodsFifteen studies involving 1109 participants were included, covering interventions across multiple modes of delivery; online, in-person, and app-based.
resultsInterventions demonstrated varied effects on outcomes like quality of life, depression, anxiety, stress, mood, behaviour, coping skills, and social support. While some interventions, such as psychoeducation and physical activity programs, showed promising improvements in well-being, others demonstrated limited or mixed results. No significant adverse effects were reported.
conclusionsThe heterogeneity of interventions and outcome measures pose challenges for definitive conclusions, emphasising the need for future research with standardised measures, consistent sample sizes, and long-term follow-up to better assess the sustainability of intervention effects. Overall, the findings highlight the importance of tailored psychosocial support to address the unique needs of TYA cancer survivors during their survivorship journey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.