ArticleMusculoskeletal care2025
Experiences of the Management of Uncertainty Amongst Musculoskeletal First Contact Practitioners Working in Primary Care.
Article in Musculoskeletal care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- First Contact Physiotherapists (FCPs) Referral Practices to Rheumatology: A Scoping Review of the Evidence Base.Musculoskeletal care · 2026Article
- Understanding the retention and support needs of UK first contact practitioner physiotherapists in primary care; a realist review.BMC primary care · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo develop a deeper understanding of strategies used to manage uncertainty by Musculoskeletal First Contact Practitioners (MSK FCPs), including barriers to and facilitators for these strategies.
backgroundMSK FCP services provide patients with an alternative to seeing their GP regarding MSK complaints. Research suggests that the role demands different skills and attributes from traditional physiotherapy roles, including the ability to deal with greater clinical uncertainty. There is a lack of research evaluating the strategies FCPs find most helpful for managing uncertainty.
methodA qualitative study using semi-structured online interviews. Participants were recruited using convenience sampling. Data was analysed using Braun & Clarke's reflexive approach to thematic analysis. The research was underpinned by a theoretical framework of hermeneutic phenomenology.
findingsNine participants were recruited. Three main themes were developed: (1) Being comfortable with being uncomfortable; (2) Teamwork makes the dream work and (3) Navigating uncertainty with patients.
conclusionThis study provides further insight into how FCPs manage uncertainty. Management of uncertainty was influenced by many factors, including: clinician experience, patient complexity and wider medical knowledge, fear of over-medicalising patients, communication and consultation styles and having protected non-clinical time. Recommendations for clinical practice include: consideration of the challenges facing FCPs, and what support is needed to maintain staff retention, health and wellbeing; consideration of how FCPs might best approach meeting the needs of an ageing population and supporting change in health and wellness behaviour. The key to successful management of uncertainty was having a supportive team which encouraged open non-judgemental discussions about uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.