ArticleBiophysical journal2025
Enhancing fluorescence correlation spectroscopy with machine learning to infer anomalous molecular motion.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The random motion of molecules in living cells has consistently been reported to deviate from standard Brownian motion, a behavior coined as "anomalous diffusion." To study this phenomenon in living cells, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) and single-particle tracking (SPT) are the two main methods of reference. In opposition to SPT, FCS, with its classical analysis methodology, cannot consider models of motion for which no analytical expression of the auto-correlation function is known. This excludes, for instance, anomalous continuous-time random walks and random walk on fractal. Moreover, the whole acquisition sequence of the classical FCS methodology takes several tens of minutes. Here, we propose a new analysis approach that frees FCS of these limitations. Our approach associates each individual FCS recording with a vector of features based on an estimator of the auto-correlation function and uses machine learning to infer the underlying model of motion and to estimate the values of the motion parameters. Using simulated recordings, we show that this approach endows FCS with the capacity to distinguish between a range of standard and anomalous random motions, including continuous-time random walk and random walk on fractal. Our approach exhibits performances comparable to the best-in-class state-of-the-art algorithms for SPT and can be used with a range of FCS setup parameters. Since it can be applied on individual recordings of short duration, we show that, with our method, FCS can be used to monitor rapid changes of the motion parameters. Finally, we apply our method on experimental FCS recordings of calibrated fluorescent beads in increasing concentrations of glycerol in water. Our results accurately predict that the beads follow Brownian motion with a diffusion coefficient and anomalous exponent, which agree with classical predictions from Stokes-Einstein law even at large glycerol concentrations. Taken together, our approach significantly augments the analysis power of FCS to capacities that are similar to state-of-the-art SPT approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.