ArticlePhysiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy2025
Physiotherapists' Use of Attentional Focus Instructions and Feedback in the Philippines: A Survey Study.
Article in Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeVerbal instructions and feedback are critical motor learning elements within physiotherapy practice. With evident advantages associated with instructions and feedback that direct learner attention externally, it has been recommended that knowledge about the focus of attention (FOA) be translated into physiotherapy practice. However, most existing information on this topic comes from non-Asian and high-resourced settings. This study aims to fill the knowledge gap regarding context-specific practice patterns by examining the preferences of physiotherapists in the Philippines for external or internal FOA when delivering instructions and feedback across various practice areas. We also explored how professional characteristics relate to these preferences and considerations for delivering instructions and feedback.
methodsThis study employed a cross-sectional survey design. A total of 223 physiotherapists completed an online survey, of which 182 answered questions on their preferences for external or internal FOA based on clinical scenarios. The survey also collected information on participants' professional and practice backgrounds, conscious planning in delivering instructions and feedback, and considerations for varying instructions and feedback.
resultsThe participants tended to prefer internal FOA for delivering instructions and feedback, which was not associated with educational background, years of experience, specialisation, geographic region, practice setting, or FOA familiarity. While only approximately half of the respondents were familiar with the concept of FOA, the majority tended to consciously plan the delivery of instructions and feedback based on clients' cognitive and impairment levels. DISCUSSION: There is an overall preference for internal FOA for delivering instructions and feedback among physiotherapists in the Philippines. Work is needed to enhance practitioners' knowledge of the evidence related to FOA and to facilitate knowledge translation that enables the utilisation of research in physiotherapy practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.