ArticleJournal of shoulder and elbow surgery2025
Developing a three-dimensional convolutional neural network for automated full-volume multi-tissue segmentation of the shoulder with comparisons to Goutallier classification and partial volume muscle quality analysis.
Article in Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning-Based Scapular Morphology Assessment Pipeline for Glenoid Segmentation and Landmark Localization.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Highly bio-adapted hydrogels for tendon-bone interface regeneration: Natural healing inspiration, design strategies, and biomedical potential.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPreoperative intramuscular fat (IMF) is a strong predictor of tendon failure after a rotator cuff repair. Due to the contemporary labor intensive and time-dependent manual segmentation required for quantitative assessment of IMF, clinical implementation remains a challenge. The emergence of accurate three-dimensional evaluation of the rotator cuff may permit implementation with greater inter-rater reliability than common subjective scales (eg, Goutallier classification (GC)). Here, we developed and validated a convolutional neural network (CNN) model for auto-segmentation of the shoulder on Dixon magnetic resonance imaging. Also, we aimed to assess the agreement among GC, two-dimensional (2D), and 3D IMF, including their discriminatory ability for the identification of muscles above an IMF threshold shown to negatively impact surgical outcomes (ie, GC ≥ 3).
methodsThis study retrospectively obtained fat-water Dixon shoulder magnetic resonance imagings between March 2023 and March 2024 to develop and validate a CNN model for the segmentation of individual rotator cuff muscles and surrounding tissues. The CNN model was trained using a modified U-Net architecture (n = 80) and tested on an external dataset (n = 25). Accuracy was primarily evaluated using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) compared to manual segmentation. Reliability was evaluated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC
resultsThe model after training (37 male and 43 female, mean age = 55.8 ± 15.6 years) and testing (15 male and 10 female, mean age = 56.6 ± 19.7 years) produced DSCs of ≥0.89 except for teres minor (DSC = 0.86 ± 0.03). The model demonstrated excellent reliability for volume (ICC
conclusionThe development of a CNN model allows for efficient, accurate segmentation of muscle and bone, enabling reliable evaluation of muscle quality. The model demonstrates that 2D evaluation of IMF is insufficient for differentiating between rotator cuff muscles on either side of a clinically meaningful IMF threshold on the GC scheme, whereas 3D IMF shows excellent discriminant validity across all rotator cuff muscles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.