Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39921100›Full record

Observational studyThe journal of pain2025

Clinician and researcher responses to the term pain catastrophizing and whether new terminology is needed: Content analysis of international, cross-sectional, qualitative survey data.

Hannah Boyd, Dokyoung S You, Angela Nguyen, Laura Connoy, Devdeep Ahuja, Christine Chambers, Penny Cowan, Rachel Cox, Geert Crombez, Amanda B Feinstein and 13 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The journal of pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Hannah BoydStanford Pain Relief Innovations Lab, Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesilogy, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA United States; Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. Electronic address: hanerzzz@stanford.edu.
Dokyoung S YouDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States. Electronic address: dsyou@stanford.edu.
Angela NguyenStanford University, 450 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA, United States. Electronic address: angelath@stanford.edu.
Laura ConnoyArthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, London, ON, Canada. Electronic address: lconnoy@uwo.ca.
Devdeep AhujaRTW Plus, Tintagel House, 92 Embankment, London SE1 7TY, United Kingdom. Electronic address: dev@rtwplus.com.
Christine ChambersDepartments of Psychology & Neuroscience and Pediatrics, Dalhousie University and Centre for Pediatric Pain Research, IWK Health, Nova Scotia, Canada. Electronic address: Christine.Chambers@dal.ca.
Penny CowanWorld Patients Alliance, Washington, DC, United States. Electronic address: pcowan@theacpa.org.
Rachel CoxStanford University, 450 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA, United States. Electronic address: rcox3@stanford.edu.
Geert CrombezDepartment of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium. Electronic address: geert.crombez@ugent.be.
Amanda B FeinsteinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, United States. Electronic address: amanda.feinstein1@choa.org.
Anne FuquaUniversity of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States. Electronic address: annefuqua@uab.edu.
Gadi GilamThe Institute of Biomedical and Oral Research, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel. Electronic address: gadi.gilam@mail.huji.ac.il.
Sean C MackeyDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States. Electronic address: smackey@stanford.edu.
Lance M McCrackenDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Lynn M MartireDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, PA, United States. Electronic address: lmm51@psu.edu.
Kathleen SlukaDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, The University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, IA, United States. Electronic address: Kathleen-sluka@uiowa.edu.
Peter O'SullivanSchool of Allied Health, Curtin University, Western Australia, Australia. Electronic address: p.osullivan@curtin.edu.au.
Judith A TurnerDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States. Electronic address: jturner@uw.edu.
Christin VeasleyChronic Pain Research Alliance, Milwaukee, WI, United States. Electronic address: cveasley@cpralliance.org.
Maisa S ZiadniDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States. Electronic address: mziadni@stanford.edu.
Claire E Ashton-JamesPain Management Research Institute, Kolling Institute, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: claire.ashton-james@sydney.edu.au.
Fiona WebsterArthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, London, ON, Canada. Electronic address: fiona.webster@uwo.ca.
Beth D DarnallStanford Pain Relief Innovations Lab, Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesilogy, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA United States. Electronic address: bdarnall@stanford.edu.

Funding

Diverging Effects of Closeness in Older Adults with Chronic Low Back Pain and Spousal CaregiversR01AG063241 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI MARTIRE, LYNN M. · 2020 to 2024
$2.7M
Research and Mentoring in Innovative Patient Oriented Pain and Opioid ScienceK24DA053564 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Beth Denise Darnall · 2021 to 2026
$1.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG063241NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA053564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain catastrophizing is understood as a negative cognitive and emotional response to pain. Researchers, clinicians, advocates, and patients have reported stigmatizing effects of the term on patients when used clinically and in the media. This report describes the results of an international, observational, cross-sectional study investigation of clinician and researcher (professionals) perspectives on the term pain catastrophizing and whether new terminology is needed or desired. Open-ended electronic surveys were distributed to researchers and clinicians by collaborators, stakeholders, and through social media. Professionals reported on their familiarity with the term, its meaning and impacts, and their use of the term with patients. 1397 surveys from professionals in 46 countries (48.5% from the U.S.) were received. The sample was almost two-thirds female (61.3%), with a mean age of 56.67 (SD=4.04) years, and comprised of 78.6% clinicians (63.6%, pain specialists; n=698) and 20.3% researchers. The majority were familiar with the term (82.2%; n=1148). Among the 1098 clinicians, 33.6% had used the term in communication with patients. A content analysis of professionals' responses to open-ended questions is presented. Coded responses were synthesized into five content categories or themes: (1) pain catastrophizing is an exaggerated response to pain; (2) pain catastrophizing is an unhelpful response to pain; (3) the term pain catastrophizing is stigmatizing; (4) the term pain catastrophizing is clinically useful; (5) patients' perception of the term varies. Results highlight the continual controversy surrounding the term pain catastrophizing and the need for additional research and education to incorporate patient-centered approaches into clinical and public communications. Perspective: We present a content analysis of international clinician and researcher perspectives on the term pain catastrophizing. This investigation provides the largest depiction to date of the controversy surrounding pain catastrophizing and may guide future efforts to decrease stigma in patients with chronic pain and improve patient-clinician communication.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCatastrophizationPainResearch PersonnelTerminology as TopicAdultAgedChronic PainCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesChronic painPain catastrophizingPatient-centered communicationQualitativeStigma

Identifiers

PMID39921100
PMCPMC11929406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.