Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39920721›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Tough choices: the experience of family members of critically ill patients participating in ECMO treatment decision-making: a descriptive qualitative study.

Xiangying Yang, Yao Lin, Amao Tang, Xiaokang Zeng, Weiying Dai, Qian Zhang, Li Ning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Development and Future Perspectives of Obstetric Intensive Care Units in China.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiangying YangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China.
Yao LinDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China.
Amao TangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaokang ZengDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China.
Weiying DaiDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China.
Qian ZhangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China.
Li NingDepartment of Nursing, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, No. 261, Huansha Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, China. nl5401@163.com.

Funding

Construction Fund of Key medical disciplines of Hangzhou-Nursing 0020200265Medical and Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province 2023KY945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundECMO treatment for critically ill patients mostly requires family members to make surrogate decisions. However, the process and experience of family members' participation in decision making have not been well described. PURPOSE: To explore the experience of family members of critically ill patients who were asked to consent to ECMO treatment and to gain insight into the factors that promote and hinder their decision-making.

methodsA descriptive qualitative study. Data were collected using a semi-structured interview method and analysed using traditional content analysis approaches. The cohort included nineteen family members of critically ill ICU patients from a general hospital in China.

resultsEleven family members consented to ECMO treatment, and 8 refused. 4 themes and 10 subthemes emerged: (1) tough choices: the dilemma in the emergency situation, the guilt and remorse after giving up; (2) rationalisation of decision-making: ethics and morality guide decision-making, expected efficacy influences decision making, and past experience promotes decision making; (3) decision-making methods: independent decision-making, group decision-making, decision making based on patient preferences; (4) influencing factors of decision making: information and communication, social support.

conclusionThe findings provide insights and a basis for promoting efficient ECMO decision-making in clinical practice. It may be difficult to improve the time it takes to make the decision without sacrificing the quality of the decision. Healthcare professionals should provide timely emotional support, informational support, and comprehensive social support to assist them in making efficient decisions while respecting the treatment preferences of the decision-makers.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessDecision MakingExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationFamilyAdultAgedChinaFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchCritical illnessDecision makingExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationFamily membersQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID39920721
PMCPMC11806576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.