ArticleBMC nursing2025
Knowing how, arguing why: nurse anaesthetists' experiences of nursing when caring for the surgical patient.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Governing Patient-Facing AI-Generated Video in Digital Health: A Risk-and-Ethics Matrix for Deployment, Monitoring, and Change Control.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Strengthening surgical outcomes through nursing education: an evidence-based training model in Laos.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients undergoing surgery and anaesthesia are in a vulnerable situation, requiring advanced treatment and care. Nurse anaesthetists are specially trained to meet their needs when administering and monitoring anaesthesia, ensuring patient safety and comfort throughout the entire perioperative care. However, there is a growing concern that efficiency requirements might take precedence over humanistic care when having to prioritize. Most people have a limited understanding of the extended role of nurse anaesthetists in maintaining quality and safety in anaesthesia services. This study aimed to explore how nurse anaesthetists describe their practice as being nursing when caring for surgical patients.
methodsWe applied a qualitative inductive design. Twenty nurse anaesthetists working in small or large hospitals in different regions of Norway were recruited. Semi-structured individual interviews were carried out. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. This study was conducted and reported in accordance with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research Checklist.
resultsWe identified three categories and eight subcategories. The category Continuously attending to physical and psychological needs involved reading the patient and responding accordingly and the ethical and moral obligation to maintain patients' well-being and dignity. The category Providing a concerned presence involved the importance of the nursing process and nurse anaesthetists' self-confidence in their professional abilities and readiness to act when caring for the surgical patient. The category Aspiring towards excellence involved expectations towards nurse anaesthetists as professionals who display professional courage and undertake professional development through continuous learning.
conclusionNurse anaesthetists experience themselves as being highly qualified to address the needs of surgical patients. Their nursing background and extensive training have prepared them to know how and argue why. Knowledge from this study could be expected to add to the field of describing and understanding nurse anaesthetists' practice in the perioperative context and support supervision in postgraduate education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.