ArticleMolecular neurodegeneration2025
Disparate and shared transcriptomic signatures associated with cortical atrophy in genetic behavioral variant frontotemporal degeneration.
Article in Molecular neurodegeneration, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCortical atrophy is a common manifestation in behavioral variant frontotemporal degeneration (bvFTD), exhibiting spatial heterogeneity across various genetic subgroups, which may be driven by distinct biological mechanisms.
methodsWe employed an integrative imaging transcriptomics approach to identify both disparate and shared transcriptomic signatures associated with cortical thickness in bvFTD with C9orf72 repeat expansions or pathogenic variants in GRN or MAPT. Functional enrichment analyses were conducted on each gene list significantly associated with cortical thickness. Additionally, we mapped neurotransmitter receptor/transporter density maps to the cortical thickness maps, to uncover different correlation patterns for each genetic form. Furthermore, we examined whether the identified genes were enriched for pathology-related genes by using previously identified genes linked to TDP-43 positive neurons and genes associated with tau pathology.
resultsFor each genetic form of bvFTD, we identified cortical thickness signatures and gene sets associated with them. The cortical thickness associated genes for GRN-bvFTD were significantly involved in neurotransmitter system and circadian entrainment. The different patterns of spatial correlations between synaptic density and cortical thinning, further confirmed the critical role of neurotransmission and synaptic signaling in shaping brain structure, especially in the GRN-bvFTD group. Furthermore, we observed significant overlap between genes linked to TDP-43 pathology and the gene sets associated with cortical thickness in C9orf72-bvFTD and GRN-bvFTD but not the MAPT-bvFTD group providing specificity for our associations. C9orf72-bvFTD and GRN-bvFTD also shared genes displaying consistent directionality, with those exhibiting either positive or negative correlations with cortical thickness in C9orf72-bvFTD showing the same direction (positive or negative) in GRN-bvFTD. MAPT-bvFTD displayed more pronounced differences in transcriptomic signatures compared to the other two genetic forms. The genes that exhibited significantly positive or negative correlations with cortical thickness in MAPT-bvFTD showed opposing directionality in C9orf72-bvFTD and GRN-bvFTD.
conclusionsOverall, this integrative transcriptomic approach identified several new shared and disparate genes associated with regional vulnerability with increased biological interpretation including overlap with synaptic density maps and pathologically-specific gene expression. These findings illuminated the intricate molecular underpinnings contributing to the heterogeneous nature of disease distribution in bvFTD with distinct genetic backgrounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.