Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39920634›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

The refugees and health crisis: migration policy management and government response to Afghan migrants.

Kalsoom B Sumra, Muhammad Mumtaz, Naqib Ullah Khan, Helen Huifen Cai, Qiong Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kalsoom B SumraDepartment of Management Sciences, COMSATS University, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2977-5278
Muhammad MumtazDepartment of Public Administration, Fatima Jinnah Women University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Naqib Ullah KhanSchool of Public Administration, Central South University, Yuelu District, Changsha City, Hunan Province, 410017, P.R. China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6023-4066
Helen Huifen CaiMiddlesex Business School, Middlesex University, the Burroughs, Hendon, London, NW4 4BT, UK.
Qiong YuanBusiness School, Hunan Institute of Engineering, Fuxing Road 88, Xiangtan City, Hunan Province, 411104, P.R. China. juneyuanqiong@outlook.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe health crisis during the pandemic and its aftermath have caused multidimensional shifts within the economic and societal structure for refugees and other marginalized communities. Many countries have implemented programs to cater for the additional needs of underserved populations, but refugees and other migrants are usually not covered by these programs. In this context, this study attempts to explore the impact of the crisis on Afghan refugee's vulnerability and the relationship between health services, relief packages, and risk communication.

methodsThe proposed model is tested with 427 Afghan refugees' families from five major cities of Pakistan. The partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) is used to test the vulnerability significance with the crisis and government response in facilities.

findingsThe research findings show that post pandemic economic crisis, the access to health services, relief packages and risk communication is directly associated with Afghan refugees' vulnerability (β = 0.471, β = 0.501, β = 0.271 & β = 0.259). Notably the relationship between post pandemic economic crisis and Afghan refugees' vulnerability is mediated by limited access to health services and unavailability of relief packages. Unavailability of relief packages and lack of risk communication mediates the effect of refugees' crisis on vulnerability. Overall, the proposed model explains 63.3% of the variance in Afghan refugees' vulnerability with government services. It indicates that Afghan refugees are unable to access relief packages, and there is insufficient communication of risk factors. The lack of government facilities is due to the harder closed-door policy of the Pakistani government which has worsened the vulnerability of Afghan refugees after the sudden victory of the Taliban in Afghanistan.

conclusionsIn spite of hosting Afghan refugees for the last forty years, the government of Pakistan has no clear systemized policy towards Afghans till now. The paper offers practical policy implications as there is a need for migration policy management combining flexibility and friendliness cooperation to provide government services to refugees. Government preparedness has to include refugee populations in responses to emergencies and look into the current state of new Afghan refugees' flows, and take further extension in the continuation of migration management.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health Services AccessibilityRefugeesRelief WorkTransients and MigrantsAdultAfghanistanFemaleHumansMalePakistanVulnerable PopulationsGovernment facilitiesHealth disparitiesRefugeesSocial protection

Identifiers

PMID39920634
PMCPMC11806718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.