ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025
Brown-McLean syndrome secondary keratoconus.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Resuturing a Dislocated Scleral-Fixated Intraocular Lens in Brown-McLean Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBrown-McLean Syndrome is a rare clinical condition typically presenting as localized edema involving a 2-3 mm peripheral area of the cornea, which often has undergone intraocular surgery. CASE REPORT: We present a unique case of unilateral Brown-McLean Syndrome (BMS) with concurrent keratoconus in an 18-year-old male patient. The individual sought medical attention due to poor vision in the right eye, which had been unnoticed for a month. Notably, there was no history of ocular surgery or trauma, and the patient did not suffer from any systemic diseases. Clinical examination revealed peripheral corneal edema, extending 2-4 mm from the limbus, exclusively affecting the right eye. Corneal topography indicated the presence of keratoconus, which was an incidental finding during the investigation.
conclusionsThis case underscores the importance of considering BMS in the differential diagnosis of peripheral corneal edema even in the absence of ocular surgery or trauma. The potential relationship between BMS and keratoconus is explored, suggesting that long-term edema and degeneration of the peripheral cornea could alter its biomechanical properties, leading to deformation and keratoconus. Thorough clinical evaluation and long-term follow-up are crucial in managing such patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.