Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39920587›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2025

Developing a medication-safety self-assessment tool for rural primary care units - a case from Finnish Lapland.

Päivi Sova, Ercan Celikkayalar, Sami Sneck, Anna-Riia Holmström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Päivi SovaClinical Support Services, Wellbeing Services County of Lapland, Ounasrinteentie 22, Rovaniemi, 96400, Finland. paivi.sova@lapha.fi.ORCID 0000-0001-5369-2045
Ercan CelikkayalarDepartment of Clinical Support Services and Diagnostics, Wellbeing Services County of Kanta-Häme, Hämeenlinna, Finland. ercan.celikkayalar@omahame.fi.
Sami SneckNursing Quality, Oulu University Hospital, The Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1774-4538
Anna-Riia HolmströmHOH Helsinki One Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3908-5430

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn rural areas, primary care faces several challenges, and medication therapy is one of the most complex processes in primary care. With a specific, proactive, medication-safety self-assessment tool designed for rural primary care units, healthcare professionals could identify development needs in their medication processes.

methodsThe Delphi consensus method with two Delphi rounds was used to create a medication-safety self-assessment tool for rural primary care units in Finnish Lapland. A preliminary tool was designed based on three national and international risk management tools. Statements of the preliminary tool were evaluated with a two-round Delphi panel by 12 experts in primary care and patient safety. Evaluated aspects were suitability for primary care settings, medication safety relevance, and the necessity of the statements to be included in the developed rural, primary care, medication-safety self-assessment tool.

resultsIn the first Delphi round, a consensus of ≥ 85% on being "sufficiently important and essential" was reached on 39% of the statements (n = 118/304), of which 86% (n = 101/118) were included, and 14% (n = 17/118) were excluded from the final primary care medication- safety self-assessment tool. In the second round, 84% of the statements (n = 141/167) reached a consensus, of which 70% (n = 98/141) were excluded and 30% (n = 43/141) included in the final tool. The included 144 statements were divided into 12 thematic sub-groups: (1) Patient information, (2) Drug information, (3) Communication of drug orders and other drug information; (4) Drug labeling, packaging and nomenclature; (5) Drug storage and distribution, (6) Medication device acquisition and use, (7) Environmental factors, workflow and staffing patterns; (8) Staff competency and education, (9) Patient education, (10) Preventive risk management, 11. Learning from medication safety incidents, and 12. Electronic health record.

conclusionsThe developed medication-safety self-assessment tool is targeted for proactive medication risk management in rural primary care settings. While experts reached a consensus for the Primary care Medication Safety Self Assessment tool contents, adopting the tool to suit the rural primary care environments in different countries should be further investigated.

Indexed as

Medication ErrorsPatient SafetyPrimary Health CareRural Health ServicesSelf-AssessmentDelphi TechniqueFinlandHumansMedication processMedication safetyPrimary careRisk assessmentRisk managementRuralSelf-assessment

Identifiers

PMID39920587
PMCPMC11806860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.