ArticleBMC primary care2025
Inpatient preferences among patients with multiple chronic conditions in China: A discrete choice experiment.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Urban residents' choice preferences for hospitals at different tiers and influencing factors: a study based on latent class analysis and Andersen's model of health service utilization.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Mobile signaling big data, healthcare-seeking flows, and multidimensional healthcare access in Shanghai: implications for healthcare supply-demand matching and medical security governance.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Factors influencing residents' willingness to choose medical institutions first for treatment in the highland agricultural and pastoral areas of Qinghai province: a study based on the Anderson model.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Characteristics and Related Factors of Chinese Herbal Medicine Use in Middle-Aged and Older Patients with Cardiovascular Disease in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMultiple chronic conditions (MCC) have become a leading cause of low vitality and high mortality among the Chinese population. Although a series of policies has been implemented to promote patients' rational access to health care, patients still prefer a higher level of inpatient service, hampering the efficient utilization of resources in county hospitals, which are the first point of contact for inpatient care. Thus, this study aimed to identify the factors that affect MCC patients' inpatient preferences and the extent to which these factors influence their decisions, thereby guiding inpatient service utilization among MCC patients.
methodsFive attributes (institution scale, waiting time for hospital admission, presence of acquaintances, travel time from residence to hospital, and out-of-pocket expenses per visit) were identified to estimate inpatient choice for MCC patients through a discrete choice experiment. A partial factor analysis was performed to generate selection sets. Data were collected from MCC patients aged between 35 and 75 years, in Fuqing City, China. A mixed logit model was used to analyse MCC patients' preferences for each attribute. Willingness to pay was estimated by regression coefficients, and interaction terms were included in the model to estimate the heterogeneity of inpatient preferences among MCC patients.
resultsA total of 504 valid questionnaires were included in the analysis. The most important attribute of patients when choosing inpatient care is out-of-pocket expenses per visit, followed by travel time from residence to hospital, waiting time for hospital admission, institution scale, and presence of acquaintances. In addition, patients were willing to pay ¥1253, ¥434, and ¥323 for shorter times from the residence to the hospital, larger institutional scale, and beds available on the day, respectively. The findings of the interaction analysis indicated that age and gender also influence MCC patients' inpatient preferences.
conclusionThis study provides evidence of the inpatient preferences of MCC patients. Increasing inpatient insurance reimbursement rates, bolstering the leading role of district and county hospitals in the area, and strengthening information systems will empower district and county hospitals to effectively serve as the first point of contact for inpatient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.